From: Dr_Kral on 20 Mar 2010 10:55 On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 02:13:05 +0100, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars(a)web.de> wrote in <5634498.gDx1Vlcvoi(a)PointedEars.de>: >Dr_KralNOSPAM(a)nyc.rr.com wrote: >Wasted effort. Surprise -- he changed it today. > They are not going to learn the lesson if you keep replying >to them and helping them. I have therefore obvious address mungers >automatically killfiled, and add them manually to the list as I become aware >of further munging, after a hint to them. Frankly, I rather have an obviously munged/invalid address than one to an ignored mailbox. >That said, this is a case of the pot calling the kettle black. No quite -- as I mentioned above. Although you do have a point. > You might >not know this, but *all* addresses must specify mailboxes, including that in >the From header field (RFC 5536 allows using the invalid TLD as an >alternative, but I would strongly advise against that). I have verified >that your From header field does not specify a mailbox, so consider yourself >soft-killfiled (I read only your followups to my postings) for the time >being. As you surely know why I and others munge the address, I won't discuss that. I have followed your advise and munged it differently. I hope that robot harvesters will ignore me and that real people can actually e-mail me should they be so inclined. K.
From: The Natural Philosopher on 20 Mar 2010 15:05 Dr_Kral(a)nyc.rr.com.invalid wrote: > On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 02:13:05 +0100, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn > <PointedEars(a)web.de> wrote in <5634498.gDx1Vlcvoi(a)PointedEars.de>: > >> Dr_KralNOSPAM(a)nyc.rr.com wrote: >> Wasted effort. > Surprise -- he changed it today. > >> They are not going to learn the lesson if you keep replying >> to them and helping them. I have therefore obvious address mungers >> automatically killfiled, and add them manually to the list as I become aware >> of further munging, after a hint to them. > Frankly, I rather have an obviously munged/invalid address than one to an > ignored mailbox. > >> That said, this is a case of the pot calling the kettle black. > No quite -- as I mentioned above. Although you do have a point. > >> You might >> not know this, but *all* addresses must specify mailboxes, including that in >> the From header field (RFC 5536 allows using the invalid TLD as an >> alternative, but I would strongly advise against that). I have verified >> that your From header field does not specify a mailbox, so consider yourself >> soft-killfiled (I read only your followups to my postings) for the time >> being. > As you surely know why I and others munge the address, I won't discuss > that. I have followed your advise and munged it differently. I hope that > robot harvesters will ignore me and that real people can actually e-mail me > should they be so inclined. > > K. On balance the danger of being killfiled by Thomas, and of having a computer full of spam, tends to favour the former.
From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn on 18 Apr 2010 05:36 David Mark wrote: > View | Small Screen is where it always was, but not in my latest copy of > Opera. That feature has been disabled by default, but you can restore it: [de] <http://blog.icod.de/2010/03/25/opera-10-51-build-3351-small-screen- feature/> PointedEars -- Prototype.js was written by people who don't know javascript for people who don't know javascript. People who don't know javascript are not the best source of advice on designing systems that use javascript. -- Richard Cornford, cljs, <f806at$ail$1$8300dec7(a)news.demon.co.uk>
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Prev: QUESTION: Can a function be set up as a constant in JS? Next: jQuery 1.4.2 buggy |