From: Deadrat on 24 Dec 2009 10:31 Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes(a)gmail.com> wrote in news:a3926ecf-b922-4968-9242-3a21ab3ac7b1(a)o28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com: <snip/> > But I have another legal question on my mind that is slowly curiously > wanting an answer. > > What if I buy a painting from a artist that is signed. And what if I > altered a portion > of the painting in which I paint some object leaving the rest of the > background of > the signed artist and then I paint over the name of the artist who > painted the original painting. > > Question, would there be some law broken in that act? Answer, (as usual) it depends. > > I am guessing there is some copyright law broken, Yes, (possibly) United States copyright law or state moral rights laws. > especially if I thence tried to sell that altered painting. For copyright purposes, sale doesn't matter. > I am guessing that by owning-- having bought the painting, does not > allow me to alter a portion of the painting and then sign my name over > that of the original artist. You may have violated copyright law if you have created a derivative work of art. The wrinkle here is that you've used the original, and not a copy, but I suppose this is the equivalent of making an identical copy, alterning it, and destroying the original. Whether the altered work is a copyright violation depends on a number of things, including whether the original was under copyright, whether you have the artist's permission, whether you're engaging in parody, etc. In addition, there are so-called "moral rights" laws that protect an artist's interest in preserving his works as they were created. > > Anyone in misc.legal have a "uppity up" on the answer? > > > Archimedes Plutonium > www.iw.net/~a_plutonium > whole entire Universe is just one big atom > where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies *** I am not a lawyer, so this can't be legal advice. *** >
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Latin, the Enlightenment, and science Next: limit of the modulus of a complex function |