From: Alex Samad on 6 Feb 2010 16:00 On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 07:59:05PM +0100, Dr. KER?KGY?RT? Istv?n wrote: > [sorry if I post multiple times, but my message did not seem to get across, > and moderation isn't supposed to last half a day] > > Dear All, > > I have a system with a raid1 array. I installed it first with a > degraded raid array, one part of the array being /dev/hda2. After > installation I added (mdadm --manage /dev/md2 --add /dev/sda2) the > second drive, which went nicely, the array was assembled. This already > shows that the array is made up of an IDE and a SATA drive (which > might be unwise in general, I don't know, but I have these too drives > at hand currently). > > However, when I reboot, only one of the members of the array are > detected. Depending on which drive I boot from (both are bootable with > identical /boot partitions), either /dev/sda2 or /dev/hda2 is attached > to the array (but not the other one). Looking at dmesg suggests that > first the drive from which the system is booted is detected, then the > md array is assembled, and the other drive is only detected > afterwards. > > Is there a way to tell the initramfs in which order to detect the > drives it needs (so that both sda and hda would be detected, with the > appropriate modules loaded, and only after that would the raid array > be assembled)? strange, trying changing your kernel options to init=/bin/bash this will give you a command prompt when the initrd is loaded, but before anything is done. check to see what can be seen by the system, can it see hda + sda ? > > Thanks, > I. -- "The goals for this country are peace in the world. And the goals for this country are a compassionate American for every single citizen. That compassion is found in the hearts and souls of the American citizens." - George W. Bush 12/19/2002 Washington, DC
|
Pages: 1 Prev: What does "Stale NFS file handle" mean? Next: Apache2 mime_magic not working on Upgrade. |