From: BlindBaby on
On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 09:20:33 -0400, JW <none(a)dev.null> wrote:

>
>This implies that they were unavailable. 0. Nada. Zilch.
>Since they *were* available in the 70s, you were (Always)Wrong.

Still waiting for that list of consumer products that had LCDs in them
that were out back in the 70s.

Hell, list even a single stereo receiver. They brought display
technologies to the fore for years in the consumer channel, so they would
be the first to use it.

Name even one.
From: Neon John on
On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 06:48:00 -0700, BlindBaby
<BlindMelonChitlin(a)wellnevergetthatonethealbumcover.org> wrote:

> Still waiting for that list of consumer products that had LCDs in them
>that were out back in the 70s.
>
> Hell, list even a single stereo receiver. They brought display
>technologies to the fore for years in the consumer channel, so they would
>be the first to use it.
>
> Name even one.

No problem. Sensor tritium back-lit watch. 1978ish, maybe a bit
earlier. I bought mine in '79 from JS&A wholesale. Still have it,
still works. The tritium has been through a few half-lives so it's
quite dim but the LCD still works fine.

John
From: BlindBaby on
On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 18:08:10 -0400, Neon John <no(a)never.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 06:48:00 -0700, BlindBaby
><BlindMelonChitlin(a)wellnevergetthatonethealbumcover.org> wrote:
>
>> Still waiting for that list of consumer products that had LCDs in them
>>that were out back in the 70s.
>>
>> Hell, list even a single stereo receiver. They brought display
>>technologies to the fore for years in the consumer channel, so they would
>>be the first to use it.
>>
>> Name even one.
>
>No problem. Sensor tritium back-lit watch. 1978ish, maybe a bit
>earlier. I bought mine in '79 from JS&A wholesale. Still have it,
>still works. The tritium has been through a few half-lives so it's
>quite dim but the LCD still works fine.
>
>John

Does not sound like a stereo receiver to me. You are another
illiterate dumbass.