Prev: set theory intersection is multiplication, Uncertainty Principle is intersection #546 Correcting Math
Next: any injective recursive function inverts the order of infinitelymany numbers
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 29 Mar 2010 13:35 Archimedes Plutonium wrote: (snipped) > > I am beginning to think that Algebra is what the units of definition > are in Physics. > For example in Physics velocity is m*s^-1, and acceleration is m*s^-2, > and force is m*a. > Now if I were doing say mathematics instead of physics, I would be > saying that > velocity is a semigroup and that acceleration is a group and the a > force is a ring. > I think I am going to be correct on these claims. Oh, there maybe a few tinkering around the edges but overall these claims are going to be found truthful. I am claiming that the Uncertainty Principle is a set theory intersection and that the Uncertainty Principle is the *inverse* of the Geometry Principle. The Geometry Principle is new to both math and physics and is in short written as such: Euclidean geometry == Elliptic geometry unioned with Hyperbolic geometry The Uncertainty principle is written as such: Uncertainty in position intersected with Uncertainty in momentum > Planck's constant Now I need some shred of verification for this from Physics and I think I have it this morning. Now if you read this entire book of its 547 pages or more, then you know that the upper limit of numbers is 10^500. The number 10^500 is infinity and all of physics deals with numbers smaller than 10^500. And its inverse is very important for the inverse of 10^500 is 10^-500. So all of Physics take place under the boundaries of 10^500 and its inverse 10^-500. Physics already has a upper boundary in the speed of light which is 3*10^10 cm/sec Now that looks a far way off from say 10^500. The number 10^500 is a Planck Unit and is the number of Coulomb Interactions going on inside a atom of element 109. So, yes, 10^10 is a far away down from 10^500. So here I have to do a recalibration. I have to see if in Physics, since 10^10 represents 10^500, I have to see if in Physics we have a 10^-10 to represent the 10^-500. If I can find such a recalibration, would support all my claims above. Now have a look at Planck's constant: 6.63 x 10^-34 J*s , or alternatively, 6.63 x 10^-27 erg*sec Now take a look at Boltzmann's constant: 1.38 x 10^-23 J*K^-1 , or alternatively, 1.38 x 10^-16 erg*K^-1 Now take a look at the gravitational constant: 6.67 x 10^-11 N*m^2*kg^-2 , or alternatively, 6.67 x 10^-8 dyn*cm^2*g^-2 So here is the question. If Space is Euclidean Geometry and the double slit experiment is the breaking of symmetry of Euclidean geometry into its two dual components of Elliptic and Hyperbolic, then the question is, since Planck's constant is the measure of this bifurcation into elliptic and hyperbolic, the recalibration of the size of the slits in the Double slits with the size of Planck's constant, is what is needed for a recalibration. So if you look at Boltzman's constant multiplied by Gravitational Constant we have the magnitude factors of 10^-23 x 10^-11 = 10^-34 or equal to the Planck constant. In cgs units we have 10^-16 x 10^-8 which is 10^-24, and not 10^-27, but then here again the recalibration has to come into the picture in that the speed of light is a difference of 10^8 versus 10^10 and with the numeric values multiplied we do come up with an agreement of 10^-27. So the above is a supporting evidence that the world of Physics is bounded by the numbers 10^500 and 10^-500. In terms of physical units of measure, the world is bounded above by the speed of light as its 10^500 analog and bounded below by Planck's constant as its analog of 10^-500. P.S. now many will ask how in the world does thermodynamics entropy relate to gravity and the double slit experiment? And the answer is that all of physics is a transformation of geometries and the double slit experiment is a measure of the disorder in the slits and the screen is a measure of the order of counting particles or waves. Gravity is geometry and so is thermodynamics. So I used the most important constants of physics to recalibrate from that of 10^500 being the speed of light to find the microworld number analog of 10^-500 Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |