From: Archimedes Plutonium on


Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
(snipped)
>
> I am beginning to think that Algebra is what the units of definition
> are in Physics.
> For example in Physics velocity is m*s^-1, and acceleration is m*s^-2,
> and force is m*a.
> Now if I were doing say mathematics instead of physics, I would be
> saying that
> velocity is a semigroup and that acceleration is a group and the a
> force is a ring.
>

I think I am going to be correct on these claims. Oh, there maybe a
few tinkering
around the edges but overall these claims are going to be found
truthful.
I am claiming that the Uncertainty Principle is a set theory
intersection
and that the Uncertainty Principle is the *inverse* of the Geometry
Principle.

The Geometry Principle is new to both math and physics and is in short
written as such:

Euclidean geometry == Elliptic geometry unioned with Hyperbolic
geometry

The Uncertainty principle is written as such:

Uncertainty in position intersected with Uncertainty in momentum >
Planck's constant

Now I need some shred of verification for this from Physics and I
think I have it this
morning.

Now if you read this entire book of its 547 pages or more, then you
know that the upper limit
of numbers is 10^500. The number 10^500 is infinity and all of physics
deals with numbers smaller than 10^500. And its inverse is very
important for the inverse of 10^500 is 10^-500.
So all of Physics take place under the boundaries of 10^500 and its
inverse 10^-500.

Physics already has a upper boundary in the speed of light which is
3*10^10 cm/sec

Now that looks a far way off from say 10^500. The number 10^500 is a
Planck Unit and
is the number of Coulomb Interactions going on inside a atom of
element 109.

So, yes, 10^10 is a far away down from 10^500. So here I have to do a
recalibration.
I have to see if in Physics, since 10^10 represents 10^500, I have to
see if in Physics
we have a 10^-10 to represent the 10^-500. If I can find such a
recalibration, would
support all my claims above.

Now have a look at Planck's constant:

6.63 x 10^-34 J*s , or alternatively, 6.63 x 10^-27 erg*sec

Now take a look at Boltzmann's constant:

1.38 x 10^-23 J*K^-1 , or alternatively, 1.38 x 10^-16 erg*K^-1

Now take a look at the gravitational constant:

6.67 x 10^-11 N*m^2*kg^-2 , or alternatively, 6.67 x 10^-8
dyn*cm^2*g^-2

So here is the question. If Space is Euclidean Geometry and the double
slit
experiment is the breaking of symmetry of Euclidean geometry into its
two
dual components of Elliptic and Hyperbolic, then the question is,
since
Planck's constant is the measure of this bifurcation into elliptic and
hyperbolic,
the recalibration of the size of the slits in the Double slits with
the size of
Planck's constant, is what is needed for a recalibration.

So if you look at Boltzman's constant multiplied by Gravitational
Constant
we have the magnitude factors of 10^-23 x 10^-11 = 10^-34 or equal to
the Planck constant.

In cgs units we have 10^-16 x 10^-8 which is 10^-24, and not 10^-27,
but then
here again the recalibration has to come into the picture in that the
speed of light
is a difference of 10^8 versus 10^10 and with the numeric values
multiplied
we do come up with an agreement of 10^-27.

So the above is a supporting evidence that the world of Physics is
bounded by
the numbers 10^500 and 10^-500. In terms of physical units of measure,
the world
is bounded above by the speed of light as its 10^500 analog and
bounded below
by Planck's constant as its analog of 10^-500.

P.S. now many will ask how in the world does thermodynamics entropy
relate to gravity
and the double slit experiment? And the answer is that all of physics
is a transformation
of geometries and the double slit experiment is a measure of the
disorder in the
slits and the screen is a measure of the order of counting particles
or waves. Gravity is
geometry and so is thermodynamics. So I used the most important
constants of physics
to recalibrate from that of 10^500 being the speed of light to find
the microworld number
analog of 10^-500

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies