Prev: explaining why group/ring/field are important in math #548 Correcting Math
Next: Godel's incompleteness theorems
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 30 Mar 2010 03:55


Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
(snipped)
>
> Now have a look at Planck's constant:
>
> 6.63 x 10^-34 J*s , or alternatively, 6.63 x 10^-27 erg*sec
>
> Now take a look at Boltzmann's constant:
>
> 1.38 x 10^-23 J*K^-1 , or alternatively, 1.38 x 10^-16 erg*K^-1
>
> Now take a look at the gravitational constant:
>
> 6.67 x 10^-11 N*m^2*kg^-2 , or alternatively, 6.67 x 10^-8
> dyn*cm^2*g^-2
>
> So here is the question. If Space is Euclidean Geometry and the double
> slit
> experiment is the breaking of symmetry of Euclidean geometry into its
> two
> dual components of Elliptic and Hyperbolic, then the question is,
> since
> Planck's constant is the measure of this bifurcation into elliptic and
> hyperbolic,
> the recalibration of the size of the slits in the Double slits with
> the size of
> Planck's constant, is what is needed for a recalibration.
>
> So if you look at Boltzman's constant multiplied by Gravitational
> Constant
> we have the magnitude factors of 10^-23 x 10^-11 = 10^-34 or equal to
> the Planck constant.
>
> In cgs units we have 10^-16 x 10^-8 which is 10^-24, and not 10^-27,
> but then
> here again the recalibration has to come into the picture in that the
> speed of light
> is a difference of 10^8 versus 10^10 and with the numeric values
> multiplied
> we do come up with an agreement of 10^-27.
>
> So the above is a supporting evidence that the world of Physics is
> bounded by
> the numbers 10^500 and 10^-500. In terms of physical units of measure,
> the world
> is bounded above by the speed of light as its 10^500 analog and
> bounded below
> by Planck's constant as its analog of 10^-500.
>
> P.S. now many will ask how in the world does thermodynamics entropy
> relate to gravity
> and the double slit experiment? And the answer is that all of physics
> is a transformation
> of geometries and the double slit experiment is a measure of the
> disorder in the
> slits and the screen is a measure of the order of counting particles
> or waves. Gravity is
> geometry and so is thermodynamics. So I used the most important
> constants of physics
> to recalibrate from that of 10^500 being the speed of light to find
> the microworld number
> analog of 10^-500
>

The earlier post was obscure, so let me try to express myself more
clearly.

Mathematics is bounded by a finite number which above it is infinity.
We get this
number from the largest Planck Unit and is 10^500 from the number of
Coulomb
Interactions inside an atom of element 109. It's inverse is 10^-500
and these
numbers is where all of math and physics takes place. So that math is
structured
to have a boundary for the large and boundary for the small.

That means there must be a boundary in the constants of physics, the
most important
constants of physics. And we immediately recognize the large scale
boundary or
macroworld and it is the speed of light at 3 x 10^10 cm/sec.

Now it does not look like 10^10 is anywhere near 10^500, but remember,
the speed
of light is a far different parameter than the number of raw Coulomb
Interactions at
a moment in time. Speed is different from a count. All I wanted was a
upper bound
and the speed of light is surely a large number upper bound.

But now that I have an upper bound, Physics should have a lower bound
as the analog
of 10^-500. Where the speed of light is the analog of 10^500, both
being the large number
or macroworld upper bound, I need the microworld lower bound and it
must be related to the
speed of light.

So I check the constants of Planck's constant and Boltzmann's constant
and the
gravitational constant. These are probably the most important
constants other than the
speed of light (and electromagnetic constants).

Now the Planck constant is in the Uncertainty Principle and the
Geometry Principle is
represented by the Boltzmann's constant and the gravitational constant
because both
are geometrical constants of disorder and of gravity = space.

And even though the units of measure of Boltzmann and Gravitational
constants are not
agreeable, the fact that when they are multiplied together, the
numeric value is practically
equal to the numeric value of the Planck constant, and when we use the
speed of light
recalibrated for different unit systems the c-g-s or the S-I, we end
up with the same numeric
value of the Planck constant.

So what this implies is that the analog for 10^500 of the macroworld
is the speed of light
and that makes sense since no speed is faster than light. And the
microworld analog
of 10^-500 is the Planck constant.

Now whether I can run with and explore some more with those ideas,
remains to be seen.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: explaining why group/ring/field are important in math #548 Correcting Math
Next: Godel's incompleteness theorems