relativity vs velocity addition
in [Relativity]
|
From: Russell on 27 Nov 2006 15:45 Sue... wrote: > Russell wrote: > > Sue... wrote: > > > > ... > > > > > If you want to use a particle model then you need to learn QED. > > > http://nobelprize.org/physics/laureates/1965/feynman-lecture.html > > > > This piece of advice is pretty hilarious coming from a > > relativity disbeliever. > > What is a "relativity disbeliever" ? In your case, I meant someone who believes that the effect known as the "twin paradox" does not exist, indeed is made physically impossible by something or other having to do with the moons of Jupiter. At least, I *think* that is your position. It is like pulling teeth to get you to say what your position actually is.
From: Sue... on 27 Nov 2006 15:52 Russell wrote: > Sue... wrote: > > Russell wrote: > > > Sue... wrote: > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > If you want to use a particle model then you need to learn QED. > > > > http://nobelprize.org/physics/laureates/1965/feynman-lecture.html > > > > > > This piece of advice is pretty hilarious coming from a > > > relativity disbeliever. > > > > What is a "relativity disbeliever" ? > > In your case, I meant someone who believes that the effect > known as the "twin paradox" does not exist, indeed is made > physically impossible by something or other having to do > with the moons of Jupiter. > > At least, I *think* that is your position. It is like pulling teeth > to get you to say what your position actually is. Special relativity shows that the the conflict with Maxwell's equations and the principle of relativity is only *apparent*. "The Apparent Incompatibility of the Law of Propagation of Light with the Principle of Relativity" http://www.bartleby.com/173/7.html Wouldn't a disbeliever be someone who thinks the conflict is *real* ? Sue...
From: Russell on 27 Nov 2006 16:04 Sue... wrote: > Russell wrote: > > Sue... wrote: > > > Russell wrote: > > > > Sue... wrote: > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > If you want to use a particle model then you need to learn QED. > > > > > http://nobelprize.org/physics/laureates/1965/feynman-lecture.html > > > > > > > > This piece of advice is pretty hilarious coming from a > > > > relativity disbeliever. > > > > > > What is a "relativity disbeliever" ? > > > > In your case, I meant someone who believes that the effect > > known as the "twin paradox" does not exist, indeed is made > > physically impossible by something or other having to do > > with the moons of Jupiter. > > > > At least, I *think* that is your position. It is like pulling teeth > > to get you to say what your position actually is. > > Special relativity shows that the the conflict with Maxwell's > equations and the principle of relativity is only *apparent*. > > "The Apparent Incompatibility of the Law of Propagation > of Light with the Principle of Relativity" > http://www.bartleby.com/173/7.html > > Wouldn't a disbeliever be someone who thinks the conflict > is *real* ? Whatever. You didn't correct me on what I said about your beliefs regarding the twin paradox, so I'm thinking I was right on the money with that one.
From: Sue... on 27 Nov 2006 16:08 Russell wrote: > Sue... wrote: > > Russell wrote: > > > Sue... wrote: > > > > Russell wrote: > > > > > Sue... wrote: > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > If you want to use a particle model then you need to learn QED. > > > > > > http://nobelprize.org/physics/laureates/1965/feynman-lecture.html > > > > > > > > > > This piece of advice is pretty hilarious coming from a > > > > > relativity disbeliever. > > > > > > > > What is a "relativity disbeliever" ? > > > > > > In your case, I meant someone who believes that the effect > > > known as the "twin paradox" does not exist, indeed is made > > > physically impossible by something or other having to do > > > with the moons of Jupiter. > > > > > > At least, I *think* that is your position. It is like pulling teeth > > > to get you to say what your position actually is. > > > > Special relativity shows that the the conflict with Maxwell's > > equations and the principle of relativity is only *apparent*. > > > > "The Apparent Incompatibility of the Law of Propagation > > of Light with the Principle of Relativity" > > http://www.bartleby.com/173/7.html > > > > Wouldn't a disbeliever be someone who thinks the conflict > > is *real* ? > > Whatever. You didn't correct me on what I said about > your beliefs regarding the twin paradox, so I'm thinking > I was right on the money with that one. Do you believe there is a real conflict with Maxwell's equations and the principle of relativity ? Sue...
From: Russell on 27 Nov 2006 16:14
Sue... wrote: > Russell wrote: > > Sue... wrote: > > > Russell wrote: > > > > Sue... wrote: > > > > > Russell wrote: > > > > > > Sue... wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you want to use a particle model then you need to learn QED. > > > > > > > http://nobelprize.org/physics/laureates/1965/feynman-lecture.html > > > > > > > > > > > > This piece of advice is pretty hilarious coming from a > > > > > > relativity disbeliever. > > > > > > > > > > What is a "relativity disbeliever" ? > > > > > > > > In your case, I meant someone who believes that the effect > > > > known as the "twin paradox" does not exist, indeed is made > > > > physically impossible by something or other having to do > > > > with the moons of Jupiter. > > > > > > > > At least, I *think* that is your position. It is like pulling teeth > > > > to get you to say what your position actually is. > > > > > > Special relativity shows that the the conflict with Maxwell's > > > equations and the principle of relativity is only *apparent*. > > > > > > "The Apparent Incompatibility of the Law of Propagation > > > of Light with the Principle of Relativity" > > > http://www.bartleby.com/173/7.html > > > > > > Wouldn't a disbeliever be someone who thinks the conflict > > > is *real* ? > > > > Whatever. You didn't correct me on what I said about > > your beliefs regarding the twin paradox, so I'm thinking > > I was right on the money with that one. > > Do you believe there is a real conflict with Maxwell's > equations and the principle of relativity ? No. Why do you ask? |