From: Archimedes Plutonium on
I need to organize these chapters for the 5th edition of this book. No
point in
having two chapters on the redshift so I combined those into one. That
left
a gap opening for a chapter on the evolution of galaxies from
spherical to
elliptical galaxies and how magnetohydrodynamics is probably the main
force
behind this evolutionary process.

Since I am adamant that the most proving and deciding evidence of the
Atom Totality that dismisses the Big Bang theory is the cosmic
blackbody microwave
background radiation, it becomes chapter 3, and that I need to
associate more
the Dirac new radioactivities in chapter 1 and 3. To emphasize that
the Atom
Totality theory is a progression of Atom Totalities from a Hydrogen
Atom Totality
to a Helium Atom Totality to a Lithium Atom Totality all the way
upwards to our
present day Plutonium Atom Totality. This progression is not a hot
cosmic temperature
progression but a cool progression of a constant creation of new
matter via
Dirac new radioactivities.


The Big Bang theory is not a entity theory, not a "something theory"
but rather
a process of an explosion and to Big Bang believers the universe is
not a
"something" but rather a "process".

Now on those grounds alone, logic is averse to a theory that is a mere
process.
A theory that is a "becoming of something" but always stuck in a
process mode.
For an explosion never ends up as a "something". Unless, I suppose the
believers
of the Big Bang want gravity to halt the explosion and then bring the
Universe back
to some entity.

Now, for the life of me, I cannot think of another theory of science
that is wholly a
process without ever a substance or entity or something that the
process acts upon
to make a integral theory. Now Darwin evolution theory has a process
involved but it
also has a entity involved of genetics. Nay, I cannot think of one
single theory of science
other than the Big Bang theory that is utterly deplete of a substance
or a entity and where
the entire theory is simply a 100% process. It is sort of like saying
that we can have a
theory of science on a vacuum. We know how to make partial vaccuums in
a process of
removing all matter and energy from a container, but then, to say we
have a science theory
on vaccuums is nonsense to be nice about it.

So unlike the Big Bang theory of its sole term of an explosion and it
being a 100% process
with no substance or entity for the process to work upon, the Atom
Totality theory is both
a process and a crystal clear entity of something-- the elements of
the periodic table.
The process in the Atom Totality is where one atom totality builds up
enough new atoms that
it catapults the atom totality into the next higher atomic number Atom
Totality. This creation
of new matter is the Dirac new radioactivities.

So in the Atom Totality theory, the theory has both material matter to
work with and a process
of change. Whereas the Big Bang theory is only process-- of a
explosion.

So now, when science observed in the late 20th century that the Cosmic
Microwave
Background Radiation was a Quantum Blackbody radiation, immediately
supports the
Atom Totality theory as it says the Universe is a something-- a entity
and is a big atom
to have a cavity inside that atom to create a blackbody microwave
radiation. The Big Bang theory is destroyed with that evidence of a
blackbody microwave, because the Big Bang
is not an entity, is not a container or cavity to have a blackbody
microwave radiation
at 2.71 Kelvin.

So in chapter 1, I need to expand on the idea of a progression of atom
totalities from
hydrogen to helium all the way up through the chemical elements to
plutonium. Whereas
the Big Bang is just all process and no substance, is just one
explosion, that could not
possibly render a blackbody microwave cosmic radiation.


Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies