Prev: [PATCH 2/2] platform: Facilitate the creation of pseudo-platform buses
Next: Compile one file in kernel
From: Stephen Rothwell on 10 Aug 2010 20:50 Hi All, On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 10:17:51 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr(a)canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > > Reported by me June 22 with a fixup, reminded Aug 4 and yesterday ... it > needed to be fixed up by Linus when he merged Al's tree ... I will apply this fix patch to linux-next today ... Al, Christoph, this is the fix I sent out earlier. Is it correct enough for Linus to apply it? From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr(a)canb.auug.org.au> Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:15:01 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] v9fs: fixup for inode_setattr being removed Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr(a)canb.auug.org.au> --- fs/9p/vfs_inode.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c b/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c index f027a42..2ec7bfa 100644 --- a/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c +++ b/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c @@ -1052,10 +1052,19 @@ static int v9fs_vfs_setattr_dotl(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *iattr) return PTR_ERR(fid); retval = p9_client_setattr(fid, &p9attr); - if (retval >= 0) - retval = inode_setattr(dentry->d_inode, iattr); + if (retval < 0) + return retval; - return retval; + if ((iattr->ia_valid & ATTR_SIZE) && + iattr->ia_size != i_size_read(dentry->d_inode)) { + retval = vmtruncate(dentry->d_inode, iattr->ia_size); + if (retval) + return retval; + } + + setattr_copy(dentry->d_inode, iattr); + mark_inode_dirty(dentry->d_inode); + return 0; } /** -- 1.7.1 -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr(a)canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Al Viro on 10 Aug 2010 21:00 On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:45:03AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi All, > > On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 10:17:51 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr(a)canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > > > > Reported by me June 22 with a fixup, reminded Aug 4 and yesterday ... it > > needed to be fixed up by Linus when he merged Al's tree ... > > I will apply this fix patch to linux-next today ... Al, Christoph, this > is the fix I sent out earlier. Is it correct enough for Linus to apply > it? > > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr(a)canb.auug.org.au> > Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:15:01 +1000 > Subject: [PATCH] v9fs: fixup for inode_setattr being removed > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr(a)canb.auug.org.au> > --- > fs/9p/vfs_inode.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- > 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c b/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c > index f027a42..2ec7bfa 100644 > --- a/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c > +++ b/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c > @@ -1052,10 +1052,19 @@ static int v9fs_vfs_setattr_dotl(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *iattr) > return PTR_ERR(fid); > > retval = p9_client_setattr(fid, &p9attr); > - if (retval >= 0) > - retval = inode_setattr(dentry->d_inode, iattr); > + if (retval < 0) > + return retval; > > - return retval; > + if ((iattr->ia_valid & ATTR_SIZE) && > + iattr->ia_size != i_size_read(dentry->d_inode)) { > + retval = vmtruncate(dentry->d_inode, iattr->ia_size); > + if (retval) > + return retval; > + } > + > + setattr_copy(dentry->d_inode, iattr); > + mark_inode_dirty(dentry->d_inode); > + return 0; > } Whiskey Tango Fotrot, Over In Linus' tree we have commit 1025774ce411f2bd4b059ad7b53f0003569b74fa Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch(a)lst.de> Date: Fri Jun 4 11:30:02 2010 +0200 .... diff --git a/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c b/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c index 4331b3b..4b3ad6a 100644 --- a/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c +++ b/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c @@ -896,10 +896,19 @@ static int v9fs_vfs_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct } retval = p9_client_wstat(fid, &wstat); - if (retval >= 0) - retval = inode_setattr(dentry->d_inode, iattr); + if (retval < 0) + return retval; + + if ((iattr->ia_valid & ATTR_SIZE) && + iattr->ia_size != i_size_read(dentry->d_inode)) { + retval = vmtruncate(dentry->d_inode, iattr->ia_size); + if (retval) + return retval; + } So what the hell is going on? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Andrew Morton on 10 Aug 2010 21:10 On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 01:52:16 +0100 Al Viro <viro(a)ZenIV.linux.org.uk> wrote: > Whiskey Tango Fotrot, Over > > In Linus' tree we have > commit 1025774ce411f2bd4b059ad7b53f0003569b74fa > Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch(a)lst.de> > Date: Fri Jun 4 11:30:02 2010 +0200 > ... > diff --git a/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c b/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c > index 4331b3b..4b3ad6a 100644 > --- a/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c > +++ b/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c > @@ -896,10 +896,19 @@ static int v9fs_vfs_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct > } > > retval = p9_client_wstat(fid, &wstat); > - if (retval >= 0) > - retval = inode_setattr(dentry->d_inode, iattr); > + if (retval < 0) > + return retval; > + > + if ((iattr->ia_valid & ATTR_SIZE) && > + iattr->ia_size != i_size_read(dentry->d_inode)) { > + retval = vmtruncate(dentry->d_inode, iattr->ia_size); > + if (retval) > + return retval; > + } > > So what the hell is going on? That's v9fs_vfs_setattr(). The problem is in the new v9fs_vfs_setattr_dotl(). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Al Viro on 10 Aug 2010 21:10 On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 05:59:44PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > That's v9fs_vfs_setattr(). The problem is in the new > v9fs_vfs_setattr_dotl(). Yeah, see another posting... Fix is in the queue I'm putting together for tonight. Sorry about that... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Al Viro on 10 Aug 2010 21:10
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 01:52:16AM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:45:03AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 10:17:51 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr(a)canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > > > > > > Reported by me June 22 with a fixup, reminded Aug 4 and yesterday ... it > > > needed to be fixed up by Linus when he merged Al's tree ... > > > > I will apply this fix patch to linux-next today ... Al, Christoph, this > > is the fix I sent out earlier. Is it correct enough for Linus to apply > > it? > Whiskey Tango Fotrot, Over > > In Linus' tree we have > commit 1025774ce411f2bd4b059ad7b53f0003569b74fa > Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch(a)lst.de> > Date: Fri Jun 4 11:30:02 2010 +0200 > ... > diff --git a/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c b/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c > index 4331b3b..4b3ad6a 100644 > --- a/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c > +++ b/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c > @@ -896,10 +896,19 @@ static int v9fs_vfs_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct D'oh. Different function, appeared there only recently. OK, I'll drop your fix into today's pull request (in about an hour). ACK. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |