From: Mark T on 21 Jan 2010 02:53 Sure would like to be able to afford a bounty on a Ruby (framework agnostic) OWASP ESAPI. http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:OWASP_Enterprise_Security_API MarkT -- ãã§ãã¯ã¢ã¦ãããJingle ã ! It's a Jingle Out There!
From: Roger Pack on 21 Jan 2010 12:30 > Sure would like to be able to afford a bounty on a Ruby (framework > agnostic) OWASP ESAPI. > > http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:OWASP_Enterprise_Security_API > > MarkT You could add just like a $10 one to the list--I'll chip in a few bucks. -r -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
From: Charles Oliver Nutter on 21 Jan 2010 15:57 On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:07 AM, Roger Pack <rogerdpack2(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Fifth time's a charm (durn spam filters) > > ========Announcing the creation of a "ruby bounty" list============= I added a couple more for JRuby: JRuby C Extension support - we have an early start at such a library (http://github.com/wmeissner/jruby-cext) but we need more C hackers willing to help us build it out. We will only support the "safe" C functions that don't let you manipulate objects internals directly or get direct access to pointers. Pure-Java Nokogiri - Just what it sounds like...for places where libxml isn't available or native libraries are forbidden. Dive in :) - Charlie
From: Roger Pack on 24 Jan 2010 00:49 > Pure-Java Nokogiri - Just what it sounds like...for places where > libxml isn't available or native libraries are forbidden. > > Dive in :) Looks like pure java Nokogiri is something popular--the bounty on it has already risen to $225 -r -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
From: Charles Oliver Nutter on 24 Jan 2010 07:15 On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:49 PM, Roger Pack <rogerpack2005(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Looks like pure java Nokogiri is something popular--the bounty on it has > already risen to $225 It's probably the most oft-encountered stumbling block for folks using JRuby (these days), since Nokogiri itself has become very popular and is now depended on by many other libraries. A pure-Java version would never need special handling on any platform, would work on any platform where JRuby works, and would not require native library support at all. I implore gem authors: think about who you might hurt with hard gem dependencies on native extensions. At least provide an alternative path. - Charlie
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Prev: extending ruby: ruby_init() instacloses process Next: SizedQueue |