samba and ms server 2008
in [Samba]
|
From: Gaiseric Vandal on 9 Aug 2010 15:10 http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Windows7 I would be pretty sure that if Windows 7 doesn't work with Samba 3.0.x that Windows 2008 won't either. Rather than compiling samba 3.4 or 3.5 from source I would go with Fedora Core 11 (samba 3.3.x) or some other more up-to-date linux distro that has a newer version of samba included. I wouldn't start anything with 3.0.xx. I would (maybe stating the obvious) set up a test environment 1st. I did start playing with FC13 (samba 3.5)- not sure it behaved properly. I personally would stick with FC12 which I think had samba 3.4.x included- since I am pretty familiar with 3.4.x but not 3.5.x. There were definately some config changes between 3.0.x and 3.4.x (group mapping, domain trusts.) On 08/09/2010 02:56 PM, Peter Lawrie wrote: > Hi > I am about to set up a Centos server with samba and an MS server 2008 for a > new customer. > The MS server is required because he has an MSSQL application. The samba > shares will be for everything else. > I've previously set up centos and redhat servers as domain members with a > 2003 pdc > before I get stuck, are there any issues I should worry about with server > 2008? > What release of samba should I run? > Are there any differences in configuration compared with samba3.0.33 which > comes with centos5.5 > Peter > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3059 - Release Date: 08/09/10 > 07:35:00 > > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
From: Rob Townley on 9 Aug 2010 21:00 On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Gaiseric Vandal <gaiseric.vandal(a)gmail.com> wrote: > http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Windows7 > > > I would be pretty sure that if Windows 7 doesn't work with Samba 3.0.x that > Windows 2008 won't either. Rather than compiling samba 3.4 or 3.5 from > source I would go with Fedora Core 11 (samba 3.3.x) or some other more > up-to-date linux distro that has a newer version of samba included. I > wouldn't start anything with 3.0.xx. > > I would (maybe stating the obvious) set up a test environment 1st. I did > start playing with FC13 (samba 3.5)- not sure it behaved properly. I > personally would stick with FC12 which I think had samba 3.4.x included- > since I am pretty familiar with 3.4.x but not 3.5.x. There were definately > some config changes between 3.0.x and 3.4.x (group mapping, domain trusts..) > > > > > On 08/09/2010 02:56 PM, Peter Lawrie wrote: >> >> Hi >> I am about to set up a Centos server with samba and an MS server 2008 for >> a >> new customer. >> The MS server is required because he has an MSSQL application. The samba >> shares will be for everything else. >> I've previously set up centos and redhat servers as domain members with a >> 2003 pdc >> before I get stuck, are there any issues I should worry about with server >> 2008? >> What release of samba should I run? >> Are there any differences in configuration compared with samba3.0.33 which >> comes with centos5.5 >> Peter >> No virus found in this outgoing message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3059 - Release Date: 08/09/10 >> 07:35:00 >> >> > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > If you want to use CentOS, then your best bet would probably be : http://enterprisesamba.com/index.php?id=123 They do have a 64 bit packages, but you have to click on the 386 packages and navigate up and down to see the x86_64 packages. Better yet, simply add this repo file as /etc/yum.repos.d/sernet-samba.repo and then yum install samba3*. Not samba, but samba3 as they name packages differently. http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.5/rhel/5/sernet-samba.repo [sernet-samba] name=SerNet Samba Team packages (RedHat Enterprise Linux 5) type=rpm-md baseurl=http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.5/rhel/5 enabled=1 gpgcheck=0 Let us know how it goes. Are you using 2008 or 2008R2? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
From: Daniel Müller on 10 Aug 2010 02:40 Look at my thread: HOWTO samba4 centos5.5 named dnsupdate drbd simple failover ----------------------------------------------- EDV Daniel Müller Leitung EDV Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus Paul-Lechler-Str. 24 72076 Tübingen Tel.: 07071/206-463, Fax: 07071/206-499 eMail: mueller(a)tropenklinik.de Internet: www.tropenklinik.de ----------------------------------------------- -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: samba-bounces(a)lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces(a)lists.samba.org] Im Auftrag von Rob Townley Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. August 2010 02:59 An: gaiseric.vandal(a)gmail.com Cc: samba(a)lists.samba.org Betreff: Re: [Samba] samba and ms server 2008 On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Gaiseric Vandal <gaiseric.vandal(a)gmail.com> wrote: > http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Windows7 > > > I would be pretty sure that if Windows 7 doesn't work with Samba 3.0.x that > Windows 2008 won't either. Rather than compiling samba 3.4 or 3.5 from > source I would go with Fedora Core 11 (samba 3.3.x) or some other more > up-to-date linux distro that has a newer version of samba included. I > wouldn't start anything with 3.0.xx. > > I would (maybe stating the obvious) set up a test environment 1st. I did > start playing with FC13 (samba 3.5)- not sure it behaved properly. I > personally would stick with FC12 which I think had samba 3.4.x included- > since I am pretty familiar with 3.4.x but not 3.5.x. There were definately > some config changes between 3.0.x and 3.4.x (group mapping, domain trusts.) > > > > > On 08/09/2010 02:56 PM, Peter Lawrie wrote: >> >> Hi >> I am about to set up a Centos server with samba and an MS server 2008 for >> a >> new customer. >> The MS server is required because he has an MSSQL application. The samba >> shares will be for everything else. >> I've previously set up centos and redhat servers as domain members with a >> 2003 pdc >> before I get stuck, are there any issues I should worry about with server >> 2008? >> What release of samba should I run? >> Are there any differences in configuration compared with samba3.0.33 which >> comes with centos5.5 >> Peter >> No virus found in this outgoing message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3059 - Release Date: 08/09/10 >> 07:35:00 >> >> > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > If you want to use CentOS, then your best bet would probably be : http://enterprisesamba.com/index.php?id=123 They do have a 64 bit packages, but you have to click on the 386 packages and navigate up and down to see the x86_64 packages. Better yet, simply add this repo file as /etc/yum.repos.d/sernet-samba.repo and then yum install samba3*. Not samba, but samba3 as they name packages differently. http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.5/rhel/5/sernet-samba.repo [sernet-samba] name=SerNet Samba Team packages (RedHat Enterprise Linux 5) type=rpm-md baseurl=http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.5/rhel/5 enabled=1 gpgcheck=0 Let us know how it goes. Are you using 2008 or 2008R2? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
|
Pages: 1 Prev: [Samba] samba and ms server 2008 Next: [Samba] Youtube Video - Follow |