Prev: [PATCH 12/33] lmb: Add find_memory_core_early()
Next: [PATCH] added S6E63M0 AMOLED LCD Panel driver.
From: Michael Neuling on 30 Mar 2010 22:50 Peter & Ingo, At the end of update_sg_lb_stats() we have this calculation: sgs->group_capacity = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(group->cpu_power, SCHED_LOAD_SCALE); At the sibling level when we have SMT2, cpu_power will be 1178/2 (provided we are not scaling power with freq say) and SCHED_LOAD_SCALE will be 1024, resulting in group_capacity being 1. If we have SMT4, cpu_power will be 1178/4, hence group_capacity will end up as 0. Shouldn't group capacity always be >= 1? Do we need to round this up instead or make sure group_capacity is minimum of 1? Or do we need to change the way we calculate cpu_power in the SMT > 2 case? A similar problem could occur in SMT2 mode if cpu_power was scaled down to less than 1024. (FWIW the undocumented sprinkling of DIV_ROUND_blah in kernel/sched* is somewhat disconcerting) Regards, Mikey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |