From: Patrick Coilland on
Hello everybody

Is there a known closed form for sum_{k=1,+infty}1/(a^k-1), where "a" is
a positive integer > 1 ?
From: Dan Cass on
> Hello everybody
>
> Is there a known closed form for
> sum_{k=1,+infty}1/(a^k-1), where "a" is
> a positive integer > 1 ?

Maple doesn't know this sum in closed form.
Maybe God knows it.
From: Patrick Coilland on
Dan Cass a écrit :
>> Hello everybody
>>
>> Is there a known closed form for
>> sum_{k=1,+infty}1/(a^k-1), where "a" is
>> a positive integer > 1 ?
>
> Maple doesn't know this sum in closed form.
> Maybe God knows it.

Ok, thanks :)
I'll ask Him ;)
From: Jim Ferry on
On Nov 18, 5:10 am, Patrick Coilland <pcoill...(a)pcc.fr> wrote:
> Hello everybody
>
> Is there a known closed form for sum_{k=1,+infty}1/(a^k-1), where "a" is
> a positive integer > 1 ?

This can be expressed in terms of the q-digamma function,
though this probably doesn't help much. See

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/q-PolygammaFunction.html

Let phi(z,q) denote the q-digamma function. Then

sum_{k=1,+infty}1/(a^k-1) =
1 - (log(a-1) + phi(1,1/a))/log(a) for real a > 1.

BTW, phi(1,q) increases from -EulerGamma to 0 as
q decreases from 1 to 0.
From: Achava Nakhash, the Loving Snake on
On Nov 18, 2:10 am, Patrick Coilland <pcoill...(a)pcc.fr> wrote:
> Hello everybody
>
> Is there a known closed form for sum_{k=1,+infty}1/(a^k-1), where "a" is
> a positive integer > 1 ?

Just a little comment about English. The s on the end of a word
usually means that it is a plural, but sometimes a word just ends in
the letter s. One such word is series. We can have one series, or we
can have two series, but there is no such word as serie in English.
This is a common error in sci.math, and I am guessing at the reason it
is made. At the moment I can't think of any other English words that
end in s that aren't plural forms, but I expect some will come to me
later.

Just in case you care,
Achava