Prev: Mistake in the specification of rotatef ?
Next: [ann] LTK based libraries Runtime Library 3.0 and Gestalt Items 1.1
From: Madhu on 11 Nov 2009 20:39

* Ron Garret <rNOSPAMon-3BD29C.15513111112009(a)news.albasani.net> :
Wrote on Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:51:32 -0800:

| It's good for more than just pedagogy (and pathology). Pascal Costanza
| has recently shown how to use it to implement hygienic macros:

No, this is exactly an example of `pedagogical/pathological': Ir be of
academic interest for the purpose of Costanza's tenure, but is not
interesting to CL

--
Madhu
From: Ron Garret on 11 Nov 2009 20:53
In article <m3639g8qs5.fsf(a)moon.robolove.meer.net>,
Madhu <enometh(a)meer.net> wrote:

> * Ron Garret <rNOSPAMon-3BD29C.15513111112009(a)news.albasani.net> :
> Wrote on Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:51:32 -0800:
>
> | It's good for more than just pedagogy (and pathology). Pascal Costanza
> | has recently shown how to use it to implement hygienic macros:
>
> No, this is exactly an example of `pedagogical/pathological': Ir be of
> academic interest for the purpose of Costanza's tenure, but is not
> interesting to CL

How fortunate that we have Madhu to tell us what is and is not
interesting. What ever would we do without him?

rg
From: Madhu on 11 Nov 2009 20:55
* Ron Garret <rNOSPAMon-914274.17531511112009(a)news.albasani.net> :
Wrote on Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:53:16 -0800:

| How fortunate that we have Madhu to tell us what is and is not
| interesting. What ever would we do without him?

It is sad. It seems the other old-timers are not interested in
correcting the intentionally misleading posts you make or pointing out
your dishonest debate tactics you continue to indule in.

--
Madhu
From: Ron Garret on 12 Nov 2009 00:31
In article <m31vk48q28.fsf(a)moon.robolove.meer.net>,
Madhu <enometh(a)meer.net> wrote:

> * Ron Garret <rNOSPAMon-914274.17531511112009(a)news.albasani.net> :
> Wrote on Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:53:16 -0800:
>
> | How fortunate that we have Madhu to tell us what is and is not
> | interesting. What ever would we do without him?
>
> It is sad. It seems the other old-timers are not interested in
> correcting the intentionally misleading posts you make or pointing out
> your dishonest debate tactics you continue to indule in.

Yes, damn all those old timers. They should all be taking me to task
for "unduling" in the dishonest debate tactic of agreeing with you.
What is wrong with these people?

rg
From: Madhu on 12 Nov 2009 04:37

* Ron Garret <rNOSPAMon-E3E566.21312511112009(a)news.albasani.net> :
Wrote on Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:31:26 -0800:

|> It is sad. It seems the other old-timers are not interested in
|> correcting the intentionally misleading posts you make or pointing out
|> your dishonest debate tactics you continue to indule in.
|
| Yes, damn all those old timers. They should all be taking me to task
| for "unduling" in the dishonest debate tactic of agreeing with you.
| What is wrong with these people?

You have introduced a typo when misstating what I've said to take away
the point I'm making. You are INDULGING, again, in the very thing I
accused of above (and it is not how you reinterpreted it for the sake of
your reply)

--
Madhu

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Prev: Mistake in the specification of rotatef ?
Next: [ann] LTK based libraries Runtime Library 3.0 and Gestalt Items 1.1