Prev: New maths formula, maths 2&3^(a->38^7839_88)-34 MATHS 3+4=4 sin(x)=oo
Next: FERMATISTS! THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS" A SQUARED SPACE",, IN REAL SPATIAL MATHEMATICS
From: Jesse F. Hughes on 2 Jul 2010 08:42 Transfer Principle <lwalke3(a)lausd.net> writes: >> Say, LWalk, can you help me out on public relations? I have used the >> term "old-math" but such a moniker has been used throughout history. >> So I need a new moniker. Should I call it the "ill-defined math", or >> how about "sloth-math" since the community knows they never defined >> finite number versus infinite number? Or how about "rumdummy math" >> which has that poetic ring and someone can use it in a song. Can you >> help me out on this, because math is supposed to be the science of >> precision but noone seems to care to do their jobs of defining >> finite-number versus infinite-number. Should I call it rumdummy- >> math? I like the ring of that. > > For some reason, I doubt that the the users of "rundummy-math" would > like the ring of that name. Yeah, but AP is right: rumdummy math is so lyrical that someone is just *bound* to use it in a song. It can be the new math analog to "We Shall Overcome". -- Jesse F. Hughes 'If you're not making mistakes you're not doing extreme mathematics." -- James S. Harris, extreme mathematician par excellence |