From: RichD on
is it possible to design a subcutaneous x ray?
A surgeon might want to see a depth just below
where he intends to cut.

The point is, I thought only bones are opaque to x rays.


--
Rich
From: Joerg on
RichD wrote:
> is it possible to design a subcutaneous x ray?
> A surgeon might want to see a depth just below
> where he intends to cut.
>
> The point is, I thought only bones are opaque to x rays.
>

That's what us guys design ultrasound machines for :-)

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
From: eric gisse on
RichD wrote:

> is it possible to design a subcutaneous x ray?
> A surgeon might want to see a depth just below
> where he intends to cut.
>
> The point is, I thought only bones are opaque to x rays.

And you think an x-ray is going to let you differentiate between the various
types of soft tissue?

>
>
> --
> Rich

From: Bill Sloman on
On Jan 16, 2:58 am, RichD <r_delaney2...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> is it possible to design a subcutaneous x ray?
> A surgeon might want to see a depth just below
> where he intends to cut.
>
> The point is, I thought only bones are opaque to x rays.

Scanning confocal microscopes can get images from a millimetre below
the skin.

Frequency doubled fluorescence microscopy does at least as well - you
focus a lot of photons at twice the wavelength that you want to excite
at the point you want to image, and rely on two-photon absorbtion to
excite the fluorescence you want to detect.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-photon_excitation_microscopy

The wikipeia article sees it as an alternative to confocal microscopy,
but you can use two-photon excitation in a confocal microscope.

--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
From: Royston Vasey on

"Joerg" <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:7rclovFbtdU2(a)mid.individual.net...
> RichD wrote:
>> is it possible to design a subcutaneous x ray?
>> A surgeon might want to see a depth just below
>> where he intends to cut.
>>
>> The point is, I thought only bones are opaque to x rays.
>>
>
> That's what us guys design ultrasound machines for :-)
>
> --
> Regards, Joerg
>
> http://www.analogconsultants.com/
>
> "gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
> Use another domain or send PM.


And very neatly too. I had a suspect freckle excised. Before removal an
ultrasound scan was done. You could see the boundary between the suspect
tissue and normal skin at <0.5mm below the surface. To touch, the suspect
skin felt just like any other skin - not hard or different.