From: Justin P. Mattock on 3 Feb 2010 13:50 On 02/03/10 10:25, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:23:01 -0800 > "Justin P. Mattock"<justinmattock(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 02/03/10 09:07, Michael Breuer wrote: >>> On 02/03/2010 11:56 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: >>>> On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:47:19 -0500 >>>> Michael Breuer<mbreuer(a)majjas.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Tracked this down. The status being returned is 0x3c0080 - good flow >>>>> control packets. Nothing is actually being dropped (confirmed by packet >>>>> trace on switch compared with packet trace on server). >>>>> >>>>> I whipped up a trivial patch to not count these as dropped packets and >>>>> will post to netdev. >>>>> >>>>> I'm not really sure what the driver should be doing in this case, but >>>>> resubmit seems to work. >>>> Looks like a flow control negotiation issue. You probably turned off >>>> flow control on the Linux side, but the switch is still doing flow >>>> control. >>>> >>> According to the driver: >>> Feb 3 12:03:02 mail kernel: sky2 eth0: Link is up at 1000 Mbps, full >>> duplex, flow control both >>> >>> So if the rx flow control packet status is due to flow control being >>> disabled, then there's a different issue. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in >>> the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org >>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >>> >> >> >> hmm.. after an hour or so I'm not seeing anything. >> from what I remember I turned the machine on in the >> hotel, then left the system there as I went out for a few hours >> (so maybe I need to wait). >> >> Anyways I did keep dmesg of when this occurred, basically >> the log was spammed with these: >> >> [ 863.294057] sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x580002 length 88 >> [ 865.646645] sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x600002 length 96 >> [ 1286.420471] sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x600002 length 96 >> [ 1286.499459] sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x600002 length 96 >> [ 1746.903826] sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x600002 length 96 >> [ 1754.263692] sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x600002 length 96 >> [ 1755.309360] sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x680002 length 104 >> [ 2213.256294] sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x600002 length 96 >> [ 2219.653342] sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x580002 length 88 >> [ 2221.673601] sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x600002 length 96 >> [ 2679.654655] sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x680002 length 104 >> [ 2692.315058] sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x500002 length 80 >> [ 2694.349612] sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x580002 length 88 >> [ 2703.676717] sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x700002 length 112 >> [ 2703.826375] sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x600002 length 96 >> [ 3187.504843] sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x600002 length 96 >> [ 3189.560744] sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x600002 length 96 >> [ 3672.475719] sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x680002 length 104 >> [ 3676.696959] sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x680002 length 104 >> >> but while using the system with this, I didn't notice anything >> out of the ordinary. >> (if this fires off I can try a bisect for you guys, but right now >> since I'm not seeing anything, might be a different story); >> > > You were on a crappy hotel switch. Those are all CRC errors. > > > alright.. makes sense cause I'm not getting any of this now at home. Justin P. Mattock -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Prev: [PATCH] ntp: Make time_esterror and time_maxerror static Next: Confirm Your Email |