smtpd_recipient_restrictions - Is PERMIT at the end advisable ?
in [Postfix]
|
Prev: Postfix + stunnel SMTPS = address rewriting issue
Next: smtpd_recipient_restrictions - Is PERMIT at the end advisable?
From: Klaus Engelmann on 28 May 2010 14:23 I would like to know if it is advisable to keep a final PERMIT at the end of the smtpd_recipient_restrictions. Below is the configuration used at my POSTFIX SMTP Server. Thanks for any suggestion. smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, permit_sasl_authenticated, check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/whitelist/rbl_whitelist, check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/whitelist/user_restrictions, reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname, reject_invalid_helo_hostname, check_helo_access regexp:/etc/postfix/helo-blacklist/smtp_helo_blacklist, reject_non_fqdn_sender, reject_unknown_sender_domain, reject_non_fqdn_recipient, reject_unauth_destination, reject_unlisted_recipient, reject_unknown_recipient_domain, reject_rbl_client dnsbl.njabl.org, reject_rbl_client dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net, reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org, reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net, reject_rbl_client ix.dnsbl.manitu.net, reject_rbl_client combined.rbl.msrbl.net, reject_rbl_client b.barracudacentral.org, check_policy_service unix:private/spfpolicy, check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:2501, permit -- Klaus Engelmann CCNA CCDA - CSCO10971632 LPIC-1 - LPI000138061
From: Klaus Engelmann on 28 May 2010 15:04
Thanks Brian. -- Klaus Engelmann CCNA CCDA - CSCO10971632 LPIC-1 - LPI000138061 On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List <grknight(a)scent-team.com> wrote: > Â On 5/28/2010 2:23 PM, Klaus Engelmann wrote: >> >> I would like to know if it is advisable to keep a final PERMIT at the >> end of the smtpd_recipient_restrictions. > > A permit is implied at the end of each restriction class. > So adding or removing an explicit permit from the end has no noticeable > effect. > > Brian > |