From: amdx on


--
MikeK
"John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message
news:dhes36d9pcknpbu59h1cbupu2jm0tdks1o(a)4ax.com...
> On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:50:42 -0500, "amdx" <amdx(a)knology.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>"John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:ao0s36praoiibqihlcc6rl8316eirkkhrq(a)4ax.com...
>>>
>>> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100714/ap_on_bi_ge/us_gulf_oil_spill_20100616040848
>>>
>>>
>>> If 100% of the oil is spewing out, why not close some valves and see
>>> if less spews out? What's to lose?
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>
>> My limited understanding is; the new cap has three valves, two of them
>> are
>>more on/off
>>and the third can be shut a little at a time. That's what I gleaned from
>>Thad Allen's last press conference.
>>They will shut one and see what the pressure readings are. That will give
>>them some info about
>>the integrity of the well caseing. There in lies the rub. Say the pressure
>>was at 7,850 lbs/sqin
>>and in 6 hrs it went down to 7,300lbs/sqin. What does that mean? If it
>>went
>>to 3,000 lbs/sqin
>>they know they have a problem.
>> I the caseing is perforated and it's 1 mile under the earth, probably
>> not
>>a big concern, but if it's
>>100 yards, we probably can't fix the leak ever.
>>
>> So, I think they're thinking.
>
> They just started thinking now?
>
> John
>
Government got involved, they decided to rethink what BP is doing.
Here's a site with about 18 BP cameras. This one is interesting in
that it shows the oil coming out of a side vent rather than the top.
BSkandi - ROV 2 (456854) bkup=45684 (second row 4th picture)
Only good as I write, they keep moving the cameras.
http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/bp-live-oil-spill-cam.html
MikeK