source code for jpeg2000
in [Matlab]
|
Prev: bluetooth data
Next: How to read grid data
From: mystery on 3 Aug 2010 16:43 need source code for jpeg2000 in matlab
From: TideMan on 3 Aug 2010 16:56 On Aug 4, 8:43 am, mystery <maryamsh...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > need source code for jpeg2000 in matlab Type jpeg 2000 into the search box of this newsgroup and you'll find 261 previous such posts as yours.
From: us on 3 Aug 2010 17:29 TideMan <mulgor(a)gmail.com> wrote in message <36b4f878-77c8-4542-9e31-d4d2d7d6b2b7(a)l32g2000prn.googlegroups.com>... > On Aug 4, 8:43 am, mystery <maryamsh...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > need source code for jpeg2000 in matlab > > Type jpeg 2000 into the search box of this newsgroup and you'll find > 261 previous such posts as yours. oh... but... the OP needs 2000(!)... a long way to go... us
From: Jan Simon on 3 Aug 2010 19:35 Dear TideMan, > > need source code for jpeg2000 in matlab > > Type jpeg 2000 into the search box of this newsgroup and you'll find > 261 previous such posts as yours. In the Advanced Search -> All Time, I get 106 posts for "jpeg2000" and 55 for "jpeg 2000" (with a space). So I assume it is a typo and you meant: "161 previous such posts". Interestingly, the replies are almost identical: "Don't ask me" and "don't ask Walter". BTW. I'd expect, that the "advanced" search could find the term "jpeg2000", if I search for "jpeg" and "2000". "jpeg&2000" simply ignores the "&" as far as I can see. This is not the level of "advance" I expect from the "leading worldwide developer and supplier of technical computing software". Kind regards, Jan
From: TideMan on 3 Aug 2010 19:39
On Aug 4, 11:35 am, "Jan Simon" <matlab.THIS_Y...(a)nMINUSsimon.de> wrote: > Dear TideMan, > > > > need source code for jpeg2000 in matlab > > > Type jpeg 2000 into the search box of this newsgroup and you'll find > > 261 previous such posts as yours. > > In the Advanced Search -> All Time, I get 106 posts for "jpeg2000" and 55 for "jpeg 2000" (with a space). So I assume it is a typo and you meant: "161 previous such posts". > > Interestingly, the replies are almost identical: "Don't ask me" and "don't ask Walter". > > BTW. I'd expect, that the "advanced" search could find the term "jpeg2000", if I search for "jpeg" and "2000". "jpeg&2000" simply ignores the "&" as far as I can see. This is not the level of "advance" I expect from the "leading worldwide developer and supplier of technical computing software". > > Kind regards, Jan Jan Actually, I told a little white lie............ I typed jpeg2000 into the search box and got 261 hits, but jpeg 2000 gave 294 hits. BTW, this is in Google Groups. |