From: Archimedes Plutonium on


Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
(snipped)
>
> Through all the years of my posting, I have chided algebra. I do not
> know
> why, for I was rather good in school at algebra. The reason I think I
> chide
> algebra is because I am better and more comfortable in doing a problem
> with

I chided Algebra because in the 20th century, the algebra was
overextended
in importance and truth value to both math and physics. In other
words, they
took Galois theory to where it could not really reach and still be
true. In the 20th
century, the math community should have tried to extend the geometry
of
noneuclidean to its fuller meaning and reach, but instead, the math
and physics
community bloated or inflated the truth and worth of Galois theory.
The cause
for the errors and fakery that this overextended Galois theory was due
to
having never a precision meaning of finite versus infinite and thus
algebra
ran amok.

> geometry than with algebra. I like to see a problem in geometrical
> form than
> in its numeric form. And another reason I chide algebra, is because it
> has
> taken too much of the spotlight in physics with the gobbledygook of
> algebraic
> theory in standard model and elementary particle physics. Geometry is
> bigger
> than algebra and so the emphasis should always lie towards a geometric
> solution.
>
> I have recognized for some time now that my pattern of Earth sphere as
> 40,000 km strips and 40,000 of those strips divided by 1/8 of a
> circumference
> is the algebra formula of:
>
> N x N / (1/8)N = 8N
>
> So previously, I was trying to understand this pattern as light
> constructing a sphere surface

I believe that is the ultimate meaning of the speed of light. If we
look at the
Schrodinger Equation, it allows for geometrical solutions of what the
s, p, d,
and f orbitals look like. But what they look like, such as on that
page
73 of Seaborg and Loveland as 8 lobed figures for plutonium atom, is
what
the speed of light would construct in one second of time. In other
words, to
solve for the shape of the 5f orbital of plutonium, you end up with a
8 lobed
figure, and the speed of light as 3 x 10^5 km/sec is the light wave
traversing through
eight lobes in one second of time. So a individual light wave builds
or constructs
an 8 lobed figure.

So when doing the Schrodinger Eq for the 5f orbital of plutonium, the
Schrodinger
Equation is a solution for ** one second of time**. And the geometry
of the orbital as shown
on page 73 is what that one wave of light traverse in one second of
time. That light
wave constructs an 8 lobed figure.



> like that of Earth traveling 40,000 km on each strip and that there
> were 40,000 of these strips
> and all this travelling done in the time of 1/8 of the circumference
> as represented by a log-spiral or the features of the pseudosphere. I
> was having trouble in extracting the meaning of
> the 1/8 circumference or the 5,000 km which would become 5,000
> seconds.
>
> But the algebra catapults me above the fray or it lifts me above the
> nettlesome worry of
> where is the 5,000 seconds coming from.
>
> The speed of light, derived out of pure math, is N^2/(1/8N)
>
> Earth as a sphere is 40,000km and 8 times that is 320,000 km/sec
> provided I stipulate time.
>
> Earth as sphere is 24,000 miles circumference and 8 times that is
> 192,000 miles/sec with is
> not far off from 186,000 miles/sec.
>
> The Algebra lifts me away from explaining anything about seconds with
> the log spiral or the
> pseudosphere nested inside the Earth sphere. Instead, the algebra,
> says simply to carve up
> a sphere into strips and then multiply by 8 and that is your speed of
> light.
>
> So how do I make sense of that? Well, unbelievably, there is alot of
> sense in 8N as the speed
> of light.
>
> If you have access to the book  "The Elements Beyond Uranium" Seaborg
> & Loveland 1990, page 73 the General Set of nonrelativistic f orbital
> shapes. You will see the Cubic Set where
> the f orbital is inside a cube and the f orbital is 8 lobes from the
> center.
>
> So the Algebra of NxN/ (1/8)N = 8N is the idea that the planet Earth
> is not a one single sphere
> but is represented as 8 spheres and where a light-wave travels all the
> 40,000 km strips of each of these 8 Earth spheres in one second of
> time.
>
> So the algebra eliminates the 5,000 seconds and makes it 1 second of
> time elapse. And the
> pertinent geometry to understanding the speed of light is that the
> Schrodinger Equation has
> 8 lobes in the f orbital of plutonium. So that light speed depends on
> the Atom Totality geometry as to how many lobes in the last last
> subshell. Then we take how many strips to
> cover a sphere or lobe and multiply by 8 for the speed of light.
>
> So here, I finally find out where this mystery 1/8 is coming from. It
> is not a log spiral, nor
> is it the pseudosphere nested inside the sphere. The 1/8 is coming
> from the fact that the
> Atom Totality is plutonium of 231Pu which has a geometry of the
> Schrodinger Equation of
> 8 lobes in the observable universe. So that the speed of light, is
> where a single light wave
> has to construct 8 such lobes in one second of time.
>
> In the future, I should not be so hard on algebra, but I am that way,
> only because, well,
> I find geometry easier and more visual and intuitive.
>


On page 71 of Seaborg and Loveland, they remark " The cubic set has
the desirable
property of giving the crystal field splittings in cubic, tetrahedral,
and octahedral symmetry
(that is, symmetries involving triply degenerate orbitals) .. "

I am not sure what that means.

What I want to confirm is that the Schrodinger Equation is an equation
that has time
in seconds, and only in seconds. In other words the equation is built
on seconds.

And the other confirmation I want is to recognize that any geometrical
solution is going
to be a speed of light solution. So that if we plug in the s, p, d
orbitals we end up with a
geometry of an orbital, but I would posit that we end up with a speed
of light solution that
has created that geometry of the orbital. A light wave that has
travelled through all the
circumferences of the orbital in one second of time.

So what I would like to have confirmed is that the Schrodinger
Equation is really a equation
that has the speed of light then an equal sign and then a computation
involving one second
of time.

So in other words, the Schrodinger Equation is a equation that ends up
with giving you
the speed of light in one second of time.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
From: Cassidy Furlong on
yeah, the p-adics are really cool, and so was Galois' Last Theorem.

thus&so:
how many of us have ever understood a proof of this theorem?... well,
if not, we'll never get p-adic numbers, or AP-didactical ones, either.

thus&so:
well, there's phi of me to one o'you; go figure!

> outnumber the intelligent so, odds are that the first replier to a post is not even dot.dot

--the duke of oil!
Rationale. In addition to political, economic, and mechanical
feasibility, one must consider the environmental consequences of
choosing ethanol over gasoline. In par- ticular, the amount of air
pollution released in the form of CO2 and other green house gases
(GHGs) is a crucial point of interest. In order to model the
difference in ethanol and gasoline emissions, it is necessary to
calculate the final mass of GHGs (in the case where 10% of the
gasoline energy supply has been replaced by ethanol) minus the ini-
tial mass (before the 10% replacement was implemented). If the result
is negative, the 10% ethanol scenario gives off fewer GHGs; if it is
positive, it gives off more.
Assumptions and calculations. Our model is based on the following
assump- tions:
1.
Itisassumedthatnearlyallofthegasolinerequiredfortheproductionofethanol
is used in the farming and harvesting stage, while other energy
sources (i.e., coal)
http://www.maa.org/pubs/cmj47.pdf
http://tarpley.net/online-books/george-bush-the-unauthorized-biography/chapter-8-the-permian-basin-gang/