suitable webmail
in [Postfix]
|
From: j debert on 1 Feb 2010 17:33 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 mouss さんは書きました: > > you mean things like > GET /roundcube-0.2//bin/msgimport > GET /round//bin/msgimport Not lately. Most recently, they're looking for version info: GET /rc/README GET /webmail/README GET /roundcube/README GET /rcube/README . . . GET /roundcubemail/README GET /roundcube/CHANGELOG etc. and not so recently: GET /webmail/program/js/list.js GET /roundcube/program/js/list.js etc. Some of the same IPs also probe port 25, connecting then disconnecting w/o talking to the server. I don't think they like Postfix. == jd -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFLZ1bChpL3F+HeDrIRAkCAAJ9HG9o4eI04VGV7lZF8Wp1kuN/MiACgg0qB +W64ICtOaIlcIovhHAre/ds= =hkCP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From: LuKreme on 1 Feb 2010 18:18 On 1-Feb-2010, at 13:39, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > > Carlos Williams put forth on 2/1/2010 10:04 AM: > >> I recommend and prefer Roundcube. >> >> http://roundcube.net/ > > +1 > > If you're going to offer webmail, you may as well offer IMAP folders instead of POP. JMHO. Yeah, I have to say I don't even understand how webmail+POP3 makes any sense at all. > I'm an ex Squirrelmail user and switched to Roundcube, mainly for the nicer user interface. I ran a tesbed of Roundcube for my users and while the interface is *much* nucer than SquirrelMail, it has proven to be extremely flakey at a massive memory hog. Maybe things have improved with the 0.3.x version, but I finally had to dump it because it kept causing PHP and Apache to throttle. > Other than Roundcube, for a really nice modern AJAX interface, take a look at SOGo. The thing that really impresses me is the right click context menus like those available in Thunderbird or other GUI mail clients. Thanks for that, I'll take a look at it. -- And now, the rest of the story
From: Stan Hoeppner on 1 Feb 2010 18:58 Charles Marcus put forth on 2/1/2010 4:17 PM: > On 2010-02-01 4:05 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: >> My Roundcube package is currently up to date, and it is a standard >> Debian package: >> >> [02:21:52][root(a)greer]/$ aptitude show roundcube >> Package: roundcube >> New: yes >> State: installed >> Automatically installed: no >> Version: 0.2.2-1~bpo50+1 > > Eh? 0.3.1 is the current version, so how is 0.2.2 'up to date'? The current discussion relates to keeping security patches current. http://www.debian.org/security/ All security flaw related new code is back ported and stable versions patched. You seem to be of the mistaken impression that one must have the latest 'release version' of a software package to have the latest security patches. This is not true of any *nix distro or Windows for that matter. Heck, M$ is still sending out security patches via automatic updates to Windows 2000 machines (until June 10 apparently). If there is a security flaw identified in the version of Roundcube I'm running (or any package), at some point a patched version will be made available in the security repository. Automated or manual upgrades via apt or aptitude will pull down the patched package and install it. -- Stan
From: Stan Hoeppner on 1 Feb 2010 19:17 Ralf Hildebrandt put forth on 2/1/2010 4:31 PM: > That's probably some sort of twisted Debian humor .) I wish it was humor... Debian Stable always lags pretty seriously behind the cutting edge release versions of a lot of packages. Then again, from what I understand, so do RHEL, CentOS, SLES, and some others. This seems indicative of "Stable" or "Enterprise" releases. The "stability" vs "features" argument, I assume. When testing is pushed to stable (not sure of the target date), I'll end up with Roundcube 3.1 after upgrading. All of that said, I don't find I'm lacking any functionality with my current version of Roundcube. -- Stan
From: Gary Smith on 1 Feb 2010 19:40
> > http://roundcube.net/ > > +1 > > If you're going to offer webmail, you may as well offer IMAP folders instead > of > POP. JMHO. > I think it depends upon the requirements. For very simple mail and setup, +1 roundcube. I have been using horde for some time for my clients (as they use more of the calendaring stuff than anything) so if you need something a little more advanced, use +1 horde. Of course, you could offer both (which we do). For some clients, horde is too much, for others roundcube isn't enough. |