From: Robert Dober on
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 7:44 PM, William Rutiser <wruyahoo05(a)comcast.net> wrote:
> Could you setup a mock NTP time source that supplies "fast" time to its
> clients then configure each machine to use the mock NTP and update very
> frequently? This may not be practical and would certainly not work if the
> machines are being used for anything except your tests.
I have heared that being killed by a sysadmin is a terrible fate ;)

Cheers
R.

From: Chuck Remes on
On Jul 5, 2010, at 2:12 PM, Robert Dober wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 7:44 PM, William Rutiser <wruyahoo05(a)comcast.net> wrote:
>> Could you setup a mock NTP time source that supplies "fast" time to its
>> clients then configure each machine to use the mock NTP and update very
>> frequently? This may not be practical and would certainly not work if the
>> machines are being used for anything except your tests.
> I have heared that being killed by a sysadmin is a terrible fate ;)

The idea of using a hacked NTP daemon to speed up the clocks in not feasible. Interesting idea though...

cr


From: Tony Arcieri on
[Note: parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.]

On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Chuck Remes <cremes.devlist(a)mac.com> wrote:

> The idea of using a hacked NTP daemon to speed up the clocks in not
> feasible. Interesting idea though...
>

Why can't the "central time" be maintained by whatever process is scattering
work to your distributed nodes, and just asynchronously included in the
messages for use whenever your workers get around to processing them?

--
Tony Arcieri
Medioh! A Kudelski Brand

From: Chuck Remes on

On Jul 5, 2010, at 3:21 PM, Tony Arcieri wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Chuck Remes <cremes.devlist(a)mac.com> wrote:
>
>> The idea of using a hacked NTP daemon to speed up the clocks in not
>> feasible. Interesting idea though...
>>
>
> Why can't the "central time" be maintained by whatever process is scattering
> work to your distributed nodes, and just asynchronously included in the
> messages for use whenever your workers get around to processing them?

Because there is no centralized server that all messages, data or control must pass through.

cr


From: Tony Arcieri on
[Note: parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.]

On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Chuck Remes <cremes.devlist(a)mac.com> wrote:

> Because there is no centralized server that all messages, data or control
> must pass through.
>

If your system is fully asynchronous and there's no central data source, how
is it possible for nodes to synchronize to a central clock? That makes
absolutely no sense.

--
Tony Arcieri
Medioh! A Kudelski Brand