Prev: [PATCHv3 11/14] writeback: prevent unnecessary bdi threads wakeups
Next: [PATCHv3 02/14] writeback: fix possible race when creating bdi threads
From: Ben Hutchings on 22 Jul 2010 10:10 On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 14:50 +0200, Stefan Assmann wrote: > On 21.07.2010 15:54, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 10:10 +0200, Stefan Assmann wrote: > >> I put Alex' idea into code for further discussion, keeping the names > >> mentioned here until we agree on the scope of this attribute. When we > >> have settled I'll post a patch with proper patch description. > > [...] > > > > Just a little nitpick: I think it would be clearer to use a more > > specific term like 'address source' or 'address assignment type' rather > > than 'address type'. > > Here's a proposal for the final patch. Looks good, but... [...] > /** > + * dev_hw_addr_random - Create random MAC and set device flag > + * @dev: pointer to net_device structure > + * @addr: Pointer to a six-byte array containing the Ethernet address > + * > + * Generate random MAC to be used by a device and set addr_assign_type > + * so the state can be read by sysfs and be used by udev. > + */ > +static inline void dev_hw_addr_random(struct net_device *dev, u8 *hwaddr) > +{ > + dev->addr_assign_type |= NET_ADDR_RANDOM; > + random_ether_addr(hwaddr); > +} [...] ....why '|=' and not '='? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Stefan Assmann on 22 Jul 2010 10:50 On 22.07.2010 16:07, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 14:50 +0200, Stefan Assmann wrote: >> On 21.07.2010 15:54, Ben Hutchings wrote: >>> On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 10:10 +0200, Stefan Assmann wrote: >>>> I put Alex' idea into code for further discussion, keeping the names >>>> mentioned here until we agree on the scope of this attribute. When we >>>> have settled I'll post a patch with proper patch description. >>> [...] >>> >>> Just a little nitpick: I think it would be clearer to use a more >>> specific term like 'address source' or 'address assignment type' rather >>> than 'address type'. >> >> Here's a proposal for the final patch. > > Looks good, but... > > [...] >> /** >> + * dev_hw_addr_random - Create random MAC and set device flag >> + * @dev: pointer to net_device structure >> + * @addr: Pointer to a six-byte array containing the Ethernet address >> + * >> + * Generate random MAC to be used by a device and set addr_assign_type >> + * so the state can be read by sysfs and be used by udev. >> + */ >> +static inline void dev_hw_addr_random(struct net_device *dev, u8 *hwaddr) >> +{ >> + dev->addr_assign_type |= NET_ADDR_RANDOM; >> + random_ether_addr(hwaddr); >> +} > [...] > > ...why '|=' and not '='? The intention is to use addr_assign_type as a bit field. Okay it it might not make too much sense to 'steal' a random MAC address but in case we add more types later it might get useful. Stefan -- Stefan Assmann | Red Hat GmbH Software Engineer | Otto-Hahn-Strasse 20, 85609 Dornach | HR: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 153243 | GF: Brendan Lane, Charlie Peters, sassmann at redhat.com | Michael Cunningham, Charles Cachera -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: David Miller on 25 Jul 2010 00:00
From: Stefan Assmann <sassmann(a)redhat.com> Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:47:40 +0200 > On 22.07.2010 16:07, Ben Hutchings wrote: >> On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 14:50 +0200, Stefan Assmann wrote: >>> On 21.07.2010 15:54, Ben Hutchings wrote: >>>> On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 10:10 +0200, Stefan Assmann wrote: >>>>> I put Alex' idea into code for further discussion, keeping the names >>>>> mentioned here until we agree on the scope of this attribute. When we >>>>> have settled I'll post a patch with proper patch description. >>>> [...] >>>> >>>> Just a little nitpick: I think it would be clearer to use a more >>>> specific term like 'address source' or 'address assignment type' rather >>>> than 'address type'. >>> >>> Here's a proposal for the final patch. >> >> Looks good, but... ... >> ...why '|=' and not '='? > > The intention is to use addr_assign_type as a bit field. > > Okay it it might not make too much sense to 'steal' a random MAC > address but in case we add more types later it might get useful. I think the patch is good enough to go into net-next-2.6 as-is, anything remaining is a refinement or one sort or another. So applied to net-next-2.6, thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |