Prev: [PATCH] rtc-ds1302: add some abstraction for new platform support
Next: setitimer vs. threads: SIGALRM returned to which thread? (process master or individual child)
From: David Miller on 11 Apr 2010 18:10
From: Yinghai <yinghai.lu(a)oracle.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:07:40 -0700

> On 04/11/2010 05:15 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
>> tcp: Handle CHECKSUM_PARTIAL for SYNACK packets for IPv4
>>
>> This patch moves the common code between tcp_v4_send_check and
>> tcp_v4_gso_send_check into a new function __tcp_v4_send_check.
>>
>> It then uses the new function in tcp_v4_send_synack so that it
>> handles CHECKSUM_PARTIAL properly.
>>
> Good, three patches fix the problem.

Thanks for testing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: [PATCH] rtc-ds1302: add some abstraction for new platform support
Next: setitimer vs. threads: SIGALRM returned to which thread? (process master or individual child)