From: hanson on
in
<http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/e98bf317f804eeec>
>
Rich Delany wrote:
[1] Battery technology is an active area of research, but an
obvious question occurs to me: why is it, no one has determined
[2] the maximum possible energy/volume, and energy/weight?
[3] And from there, discover the chemistry which achieves it?
[4] Is there some lacuna in our understanding of solid state physics
[5] which necessitates an empirical, rather than theoretical approach>
>
hanson wrote:
[1] yes --[2] E/vol = pressure limiat's given by the matl's scaling laws.
[3] Electrochemistry is a mature science - [4] yes , always & ever.
[5] Empirical/experimental work ALWAYS trumps theory.
>
As you said, this research field is enormously active.
The chem <-> electric endeavors run from Fuel cells on the
one side to Capacitors at the other. One of the most intriguing
one is the Monolayer battery, so to speak a hybrid been a
capacitor and an electrolyte free battery. In priciple like this:

M1-E----M2: charge M1----E-M2: discharge M1-E----M2,

where M1,2 are monolayers of different Metals and E is the
mobile charge carrier like O, S, or Se. The principle is to use
the electrons' different proximity or position at M1E vs M2E
The potential of its fantastic energy/volume is enormous, but
so are the problems to be overcome in this Nano technology
field. IOW what's attempted here, in a way, is to use a variation
of semiconductor technology as energy storage gizmos.
>
hanson

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news(a)netfront.net ---
From: Cydrome Leader on
In sci.electronics.misc John Fields <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:56:11 +0000 (UTC), Cydrome Leader
> <presence(a)MUNGEpanix.com> wrote:
>
>>In sci.electronics.misc John Fields <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 21:57:27 +0000 (UTC), Cydrome Leader
>>> <presence(a)MUNGEpanix.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>In sci.electronics.misc John Fields <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 01:33:12 +0000 (UTC), Cydrome Leader
>>>>> <presence(a)MUNGEpanix.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>>Do you know if any companies still make large prismatic NiHM cells, in
>>>>>>>>similar form factors to the flooded aircraft started NiCd batteries?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q=large+prismatic+nimh+cells&aq=0&aqi=m1&aql=&oq=large+prismatic+NiHM+cells&gs_rfai=CEAOJYeUfTPLTAofAzQTJ9aHfDQAAAKoEBU_QshOL&fp=bff9aea6fcd663ae
>>>>>>
>>>>>>nothing relevent there.
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> Checked all 120000 results, did you?
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW, what do you mean by "flooded aicraft started NiCd batteries"?
>>>>
>>>>here go over every result and tell me what you find
>>>>
>>>>http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=aircraft+starting+battery+%2BNiCd+%2Bflooded&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=&fp=d2eda4910a7445ea
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Aww... poor baby doesn't want to do her own legwork?
>>>
>>> If you're serious in your quest, I suggest you go to:
>>>
>>> http://www.concordebattery.com/dealers.php
>>>
>>> and peruse the various dealers' web sites for what you want.
>>>
>>> Johm Fields
>>
>>that's a really clever idea, Johm.
>>
>>I'll call up a company that only make lead acid batteries to buy giant
>>NiMh cells.
>
> ---
> Well, darn.
>
> I guess you looked through that entire dealer list and couldn't find
> even one that carries NiMH batteries?
>
> I would've looked for you, but it's not really my project, is it?
>
> Anyway I guess you missed the part on their home page where there's a
> link to NiCd batteries that they supply lead-acid replacements for.
>
> Had you followed that link you most like likely would have found that
> there's a company, SAFT, who make giant NiMH batteries, maybe even in
> the form factor you're looking for.
>
> They're at:
>
> http://www.saftbatteries.com/
>
> A link to their NiMH line is at:
>
> http://www.saftbatteries.com/Produit_NHP_329_51/Language/en-US/Default.aspx

here we go. this is sort of what I'm asking about.