Prev: Chapt 11, Space is EM; magnet & iron filings Experiment #105; ATOM TOTALITY
Next: Quantum Gravity 396.8: P(B|A) vs P(A-->B) Dilemma is Somewhat Analogous to the Rigged Hilbert Space vs Hilbert Space Dilemma
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 23 May 2010 02:33
Let me pause for a moment to try to explain this theory for the
layperson, and no
math to scare away anyone. In fact, I find it better to explain with
little to no math
rather than the usual flooding of math. I find those that rely on math
want to
obfuscate the situation are helpless and hapless in clarity so they
hide behind
math.

So here is the idea of the Orchard Visibility Problem. I was looking
for a math
probability problem that models the idea of light emitted from a
quasar far away
and whether that light can survive a billion light years of travelling
and eventually
be seen by observers on Earth. So the idea then fetches the fact of
density of
matter in Intergalactic Space. It is approx 1 atom of hydrogen per
cubic meter
of space. Now is that dense enough so that a quasar a billion light
years away
is never able to reach Earth due to it encountering matter enroute?

Well, now, picture an observer and then surrounded by lattice cells of
one cubic
meter. Those would be the first layer of cells and inside the cell,
say in the center
of the cell is the one atom particle. Now the next layer of cubic
meter cells also
has its one particle in the center and then you have the next layer
and the next
layer. Now ask the question of whether that one particle in the center
is going to
allow a light wave to travel unimpeded forever? You see the problem is
that
although the density is almost a vaccuum, you would think that a light
wave
would be intercepted by a particle some distance away but the thing
working against
the interception is that as the distance goes further, the number of
cells to
cover that newer volume increases hugely. So as we go linearly outward
we feel
we will be intercepted by a particle at the center of some cell, but
we must not forget
that as we go linearly outward that the number of cells to make up
each new layer
increases by the square.

Alright, so I have outlined the geometrics of the problem. That as a
light wave emits
from a quasar billions of light years away, if the density of the
Cosmos was 1 particle
per cubic meter, then the probability of it being intercepted by a
particle such as dust
interception is very small because the number of cells in each layer
is increasing by
the square of distance.

So if the Universe were a uniform density of one atom hydrogen at the
center of each
cell, we could see to infinity.

But the Universe is a density of 1 atom per cubic meter, but it is a
density that is
a clustered density, so that we have parts of Space that has galaxies
of enormous density
and then parts of Space where there is 1 atom of hydrogen only per
cubic 100,000 kilometer
and these are called Voids.

Can the Universe that we see at present have come to be by gravity?
No. Gravity does
not make a Cosmos space where you have huge superclusters and Walls
separated
by Voids. Only Electricity and Magnetism force can craft a Cosmos of 1
particle per
cubic meter density and where all that density is clustered into Walls
intermittent Voids.

You see it on the Experiment of magnet and iron filings above a sheet
of cardboard paper.
You see alternate bands of dense filings with voids in between.

So, now, getting back to can light waves travel a billion light years
and not be intercepted?

Well, if the Cosmos was 1 particle per cubic meter uniformly, the
light wave can go
to infinity and never be intercepted. But if the Cosmos is 1 particle
per cubic meter
and where EM patterns the concentration of matter into superclusters
and walls
and galaxies, then the light wave has an upper limit before it is
intercepted by
matter enroute to Earth.

If gravity, some 10^40 weaker than EM were to concentrate the 1
particle per
cubic meter, it is too weak of a force to make bands of superclusters
and walls
and voids.

Actually, my above writing is a informal proof that the Big Bang is a
fake theory
and that the Universe is an Atom Totality.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Chapt 11, Space is EM; magnet & iron filings Experiment #105; ATOM TOTALITY
Next: Quantum Gravity 396.8: P(B|A) vs P(A-->B) Dilemma is Somewhat Analogous to the Rigged Hilbert Space vs Hilbert Space Dilemma