From: nospam on 31 Jan 2010 03:45 In article <MPG.25cf5eb7fa4a7afc98c220(a)news.supernews.com>, Alfred Molon <alfred_molon(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > right, all those gorgeous images with lots of detail and accurate > > colours had me confused. > > The loss of resolution is the problem. But you already know this. what loss? an 18 megapixel canon 7d has far more resolution than the 4.7 megapixel foveon could dream about. even the most diehard foveon fans admit that. even the 12 and 15 megapixel slrs blow away what foveon can do and those cameras will probably be replaced with higher resolution sensors within the next few months (pma is in february). step up to a full frame slr and it's even worse. 21-24 megapixels, versus 4.7 and the price of full frame keeps getting lower with every generation. maybe one day there will be a full colour sensor that is as good or better than bayer, but as i said, it won't be very soon.
From: Alfred Molon on 1 Feb 2010 01:55 We've discussed this matter to death already. Do a Google groups search for all the details. -- Alfred Molon ------------------------------ Olympus E-series DSLRs and micro 4/3 forum at http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/ http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site
From: Paul Furman on 7 Feb 2010 15:44 Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote: > nospam<nospam(a)nospam.invalid> wrote: <snip lots of good points> >> it's a lot more expensive and it doesn't offer >> much benefit. > > That's probably the problem. Plus it would be huge with three APS sensors and perhaps even need special lenses with a longer flange distance. It seems they overcame the speed issue with video though that's pretty much solved for bayer FF 35mm now.
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: iPad: Apple could sell camel dung to their fans Next: januar 2010 |