Prev: fs: fix superblock iteration race
Next: [PATCHv4 5/11] REGULATOR: Removal of testing framework and redundancy
From: Chris Metcalf on 29 Jun 2010 09:20 This looks fine, thanks. Acked-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf(a)tilera.com> On 6/29/2010 3:32 AM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > Let's use the standard L1_CACHE_ALIGN macro instead. > > Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori(a)lab.ntt.co.jp> > --- > arch/tile/include/asm/cache.h | 1 - > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/tile/include/asm/cache.h b/arch/tile/include/asm/cache.h > index c2b7dcf..ee59714 100644 > --- a/arch/tile/include/asm/cache.h > +++ b/arch/tile/include/asm/cache.h > @@ -20,7 +20,6 @@ > /* bytes per L1 data cache line */ > #define L1_CACHE_SHIFT CHIP_L1D_LOG_LINE_SIZE() > #define L1_CACHE_BYTES (1 << L1_CACHE_SHIFT) > -#define L1_CACHE_ALIGN(x) (((x)+(L1_CACHE_BYTES-1)) & -L1_CACHE_BYTES) > > /* bytes per L1 instruction cache line */ > #define L1I_CACHE_SHIFT CHIP_L1I_LOG_LINE_SIZE() > -- Chris Metcalf, Tilera Corp. http://www.tilera.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |