Prev: QoS and/or fair queueing: Stateless NAT BUG
Next: Bluetooth: hidp: Add support for hidraw HIDIOCGFEATURE and HIDIOCSFEATURE
From: Eric Dumazet on 13 Jul 2010 12:00 Le mardi 13 juillet 2010 à 11:49 -0300, Felipe W Damasio a écrit : > Hi Mr. Dumazet, > > 2010/7/13 Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet(a)gmail.com>: > > I currently have no fresh ideas. If you want this problem to be solved, > > its important to setup in your lab a workload to trigger again and again > > the bug, in order to provide us more crash information. > > Right. I've been running non-stop since the first bug happened, but > so far the problem hasn't surfaced again :-( > > I've been using the kernel with the patch that you provided me > (nf_tproxy.c). Is there a chance that patch fixed the problem? This is a real bug, but I dont think it can fix your problem. Looking again at your crash, we see RCX=0x720, decimal 1824 As its skb->len, we are freeing an skb that was collapsed or something like that, since 1824 > 1460 (the normal MSS on ethernet) GRO is off on your machine. But coincidently 0x0720 is also a blank char for VGA screen... (0x20 : ASCII space, 0x07 : default attribute) So maybe you hit a corruption outside of network stack. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Felipe W Damasio on 13 Jul 2010 17:00 Hi Mr. Dumazet, I used the patched kernel on the production machine and squid frooze again. This is the dmesg message: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP last sysfs file: /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1f.3/i2c-0/name CPU 1 Modules linked in: Pid: 5533, comm: squid Not tainted 2.6.34 #6 DX58SO/ RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81369b2a>] [<ffffffff81369b2a>] sock_rfree+0x26/0x37 RSP: 0018:ffff88042287fc20 EFLAGS: 00010206 RAX: 66c86f938964c696 RBX: ffff88034e8f9a00 RCX: 0000000000000720 RDX: ffff8803f0ce05c0 RSI: ffff8803d441960c RDI: ffff88034e8f9a00 RBP: ffff8803f0ee05c0 R08: ffffea000dcb9998 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 000000000003d830 R11: ffff8803f0ee05c0 R12: 00000000000005a8 R13: 00000000000005a8 R14: 0000000000004378 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007f4cf33ee710(0000) GS:ffff880001840000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00000000021d5fd0 CR3: 0000000422872000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Process squid (pid: 5533, threadinfo ffff88042287e000, task ffff88042eb61a40) Stack: ffffffff8136ecda ffff88034e8f9a00 ffffffff8136ea8c ffff88034e8f9a00 <0> ffffffff813ab142 00000000000000d0 ffffffff8136f9f9 000000000eec60e2 <0> ffff88042eb61a40 ffff88042eb61a40 ffff88042eb61a40 00000000edca7300 Call Trace: [<ffffffff8136ecda>] ? skb_release_head_state+0x6d/0xb7 [<ffffffff8136ea8c>] ? __kfree_skb+0x9/0x7d [<ffffffff813ab142>] ? tcp_recvmsg+0x6a3/0x89a [<ffffffff8136f9f9>] ? __alloc_skb+0x5e/0x14e [<ffffffff81369dde>] ? sock_common_recvmsg+0x30/0x45 [<ffffffff81367b0f>] ? sock_aio_read+0xdd/0xf1 [<ffffffff813b6c97>] ? tcp_write_xmit+0x93e/0x96c [<ffffffff810ac500>] ? do_sync_read+0xb0/0xf2 [<ffffffff810acf32>] ? vfs_read+0xb9/0xff [<ffffffff810ad034>] ? sys_read+0x45/0x6e [<ffffffff8100292b>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Code: ff ff ff ff c3 48 8b 57 18 8b 87 d8 00 00 00 48 8d 8a ac 00 00 00 f0 29 82 ac 00 00 00 48 8b 57 18 8b 8f d8 00 00 00 48 8b 42 38 <48> 83 b8 b0 00 00 00 00 74 06 01 8a f4 00 00 00 c3 41 57 41 89 RIP [<ffffffff81369b2a>] sock_rfree+0x26/0x37 RSP <ffff88042287fc20> ---[ end trace 22e6ca9ef825c0e6 ]--- Seems to be the same issue, right? Cheers, Felipe Damasio 2010/7/13 Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet(a)gmail.com>: > Le mardi 13 juillet 2010 � 11:49 -0300, Felipe W Damasio a �crit : >> Hi Mr. Dumazet, >> >> 2010/7/13 Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet(a)gmail.com>: >> > I currently have no fresh ideas. If you want this problem to be solved, >> > its important to setup in your lab a workload to trigger again and again >> > the bug, in order to provide us more crash information. >> >> �Right. I've been running non-stop since the first bug happened, but >> so far the problem hasn't surfaced again :-( >> >> �I've been using the kernel with the patch that you provided me >> (nf_tproxy.c). Is there a chance that patch fixed the problem? > > This is a real bug, but I dont think it can fix your problem. > > Looking again at your crash, we see RCX=0x720, decimal 1824 > > As its skb->len, we are freeing an skb that was collapsed or something > like that, since 1824 > 1460 (the normal MSS on ethernet) > > GRO is off on your machine. > > But coincidently 0x0720 is also a blank char for VGA screen... > (0x20 : ASCII space, 0x07 : default attribute) > > So maybe you hit a corruption outside of network stack. > > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Felipe W Damasio on 13 Jul 2010 17:10 Hi, 2010/7/13 Felipe W Damasio <felipewd(a)gmail.com>: > This is the dmesg message: This error happened at 17:19:59. A few seconds earlier, I have these on squid's logs: 2010/07/13 17:19:50| clientTryParseRequest: FD 1690 (189.113.65.55:52681) Invalid Request 2010/07/13 17:19:50| clientTryParseRequest: FD 5056 (189.113.74.101:2420) Invalid Request 2010/07/13 17:19:52| clientTryParseRequest: FD 26923 (189.113.74.101:2419) Invalid Request 2010/07/13 17:19:57| parseHttpRequest: Unsupported method 'PASS' 2010/07/13 17:19:57| clientTryParseRequest: FD 17786 (189.113.69.194:2422) Invalid Request 2010/07/13 17:19:57| parseHttpRequest: Unsupported method '<D2>Yk' 2010/07/13 17:19:57| clientTryParseRequest: FD 22554 (189.113.79.151:4225) Invalid Request 2010/07/13 17:19:59| httpReadReply: Excess data from "GET http://webcs.msg.yahoo.com/crossdomain.xml" Maybe with these two errors we can create some kind of trigger program to help us duplicate this on the lab setup? Cheers, Felipe Damasio -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Eric Dumazet on 13 Jul 2010 23:30 Le mardi 13 juillet 2010 à 17:55 -0300, Felipe W Damasio a écrit : > Hi Mr. Dumazet, > > I used the patched kernel on the production machine and squid frooze again. > > This is the dmesg message: > > > general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP > last sysfs file: /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1f.3/i2c-0/name > CPU 1 > Modules linked in: > > Pid: 5533, comm: squid Not tainted 2.6.34 #6 DX58SO/ > RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81369b2a>] [<ffffffff81369b2a>] sock_rfree+0x26/0x37 > RSP: 0018:ffff88042287fc20 EFLAGS: 00010206 > RAX: 66c86f938964c696 RBX: ffff88034e8f9a00 RCX: 0000000000000720 > RDX: ffff8803f0ce05c0 RSI: ffff8803d441960c RDI: ffff88034e8f9a00 > RBP: ffff8803f0ee05c0 R08: ffffea000dcb9998 R09: 0000000000000000 > R10: 000000000003d830 R11: ffff8803f0ee05c0 R12: 00000000000005a8 > R13: 00000000000005a8 R14: 0000000000004378 R15: 0000000000000000 > FS: 00007f4cf33ee710(0000) GS:ffff880001840000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > CR2: 00000000021d5fd0 CR3: 0000000422872000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 > DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 > DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 > Process squid (pid: 5533, threadinfo ffff88042287e000, task ffff88042eb61a40) > Stack: > ffffffff8136ecda ffff88034e8f9a00 ffffffff8136ea8c ffff88034e8f9a00 > <0> ffffffff813ab142 00000000000000d0 ffffffff8136f9f9 000000000eec60e2 > <0> ffff88042eb61a40 ffff88042eb61a40 ffff88042eb61a40 00000000edca7300 > Call Trace: > [<ffffffff8136ecda>] ? skb_release_head_state+0x6d/0xb7 > [<ffffffff8136ea8c>] ? __kfree_skb+0x9/0x7d > [<ffffffff813ab142>] ? tcp_recvmsg+0x6a3/0x89a > [<ffffffff8136f9f9>] ? __alloc_skb+0x5e/0x14e > [<ffffffff81369dde>] ? sock_common_recvmsg+0x30/0x45 > [<ffffffff81367b0f>] ? sock_aio_read+0xdd/0xf1 > [<ffffffff813b6c97>] ? tcp_write_xmit+0x93e/0x96c > [<ffffffff810ac500>] ? do_sync_read+0xb0/0xf2 > [<ffffffff810acf32>] ? vfs_read+0xb9/0xff > [<ffffffff810ad034>] ? sys_read+0x45/0x6e > [<ffffffff8100292b>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b > Code: ff ff ff ff c3 48 8b 57 18 8b 87 d8 00 00 00 48 8d 8a ac 00 00 > 00 f0 29 82 ac 00 00 00 48 8b 57 18 8b 8f d8 00 00 00 48 8b 42 38 <48> > 83 b8 b0 00 00 00 00 74 06 01 8a f4 00 00 00 c3 41 57 41 89 > RIP [<ffffffff81369b2a>] sock_rfree+0x26/0x37 > RSP <ffff88042287fc20> > ---[ end trace 22e6ca9ef825c0e6 ]--- > > > Seems to be the same issue, right? > Exactly the same. Only RAX value is different, its another chain. BTW, 0x720 is not skb->len like I said earlier, but skb->truesize, and 0x720 is OK on a 64 bit machine for a regular packet. 48 8b 57 18 mov 0x18(%rdi),%rdx skb->sk 8b 87 d8 00 00 00 mov 0xd8(%rdi),%eax skb->truesize 48 8d 8a ac 00 00 00 lea 0xac(%rdx),%rcx f0 29 82 ac 00 00 00 lock sub %eax,0xac(%rdx) 48 8b 57 18 mov 0x18(%rdi),%rdx skb->sk 8b 8f d8 00 00 00 mov 0xd8(%rdi),%ecx skb->truesize 48 8b 42 38 mov 0x38(%rdx),%rax sk->sk_prot <48> 83 b8 b0 00 00 00 00 cmpq $0x0,0xb0(%rax) 74 06 je .+6 01 8a fa 00 00 00 add %ecx,0xfa(%rdx) One thing to notice are the RDX and RBP values: RDX: ffff8803f0ce05c0 RBP: ffff8803f0ee05c0 RDX being the sk pointer (and sk+0x38 contains the corrupted "sk_prot" value) , we notice RBP contains same "sk" value + 0x200000 (2 Mbytes). (same remark on your initial bug report) Could you enable CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y in your config ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Patrick McHardy on 14 Jul 2010 07:50 On 09.07.2010 19:13, Eric Dumazet wrote: > Le vendredi 09 juillet 2010 � 12:03 -0300, Felipe W Damasio a �crit : >> Hi, >> >> 2010/7/8 Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet(a)gmail.com>: >>> Please try to reproduce a new report. >>> >>> It looks like a memory corruption, and it would be good to see if a >>> common pattern is occurring. >> >> I'm trying..the thing is the freeze occured on the machine that sits >> on a 200Mbps ISP in bridge-mode. Since the machine frooze, and the >> whole ISP went down for a few minutes, I'm not allowed to run any >> tests on it. >> >> I've setup the same scenario on a lab, but since last night been >> unable to reproduce the bug. Maybe there's a clue on the this crash >> below that can help me write some program to trigger the problem? >> > > Reviewing tproxy stuff I spotted a problem in nf_tproxy_assign_sock() > but I could not see how it could explain your crash. > > We can read uninitialized memory and trigger a fault in > nf_tproxy_assign_sock(), not later in tcp_recvmsg()... > > David, Patrick, what do you think ? > > Thanks > > [PATCH] tproxy: nf_tproxy_assign_sock() can handle tw sockets > > transparent field of a socket is either inet_twsk(sk)->tw_transparent > for timewait sockets, or inet_sk(sk)->transparent for other sockets > (TCP/UDP). I don't see anything preventing use of timewait sockets, so the patch looks correct to me. Applied to nf-2.6.git, thanks Eric. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: QoS and/or fair queueing: Stateless NAT BUG Next: Bluetooth: hidp: Add support for hidraw HIDIOCGFEATURE and HIDIOCSFEATURE |