Prev: [PATCH] ACPI: sleep: init_set_sci_en_on_resume for Dell Studio 155x
Next: tracing: Remove duplicate id information in event structure
From: Steven Rostedt on 28 Apr 2010 20:00 On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 16:39 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > * Steven Rostedt (rostedt(a)goodmis.org) wrote: > > From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt(a)redhat.com> > > > > Switch the TRACE_EVENT() macros to use DECLARE_TRACE_DATA(). This > > patch is done to prove that the DATA macros work. If any regressions > > were to surface, then this patch would help a git bisect to localize > > the area. > > > > Once again this patch increases the size of the kernel. > > > > As recommended in the earlier email: > > It would make sense to just add the extra "callback_data" argument > directly to DECLARE_TRACE(), modify the user (TRACE_EVENT) accordingly. > And possibly create a TRACE_EVENT_NOARG() variant. Are you suggesting to make DECLARE_TRACE() be... #define DECLARE_TRACE(name, proto, args, data) ? -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |