From: Ingo Molnar on 29 Oct 2009 04:00 * Li Zefan <lizf(a)cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: > ____ftrace_check_##name() is used for compile-time check > on F_printk() only, so it should be marked as __unused > instead of __used. > > Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf(a)cn.fujitsu.com> > --- > > I'm thinking about introducing __always_unused, comparing > to __maybe_unused. > > --- > kernel/trace/trace_export.c | 5 +++-- > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_export.c b/kernel/trace/trace_export.c > index 934d81f..85309fc 100644 > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_export.c > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_export.c > @@ -48,11 +48,12 @@ > struct ____ftrace_##name { \ > tstruct \ > }; \ > -static void __used ____ftrace_check_##name(void) \ > +static void __attribute__((unused)) \ > +____ftrace_check_##name(void) \ > { \ > struct ____ftrace_##name *__entry = NULL; \ > \ > - /* force cmpile-time check on F_printk() */ \ > + /* force compile-time check on F_printk() */ \ > printk(print); \ > } Hm, open-coding __attribute__()'s is not good. These tags are somewhat of a mess: #if __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 3 # define __used __attribute__((__used__)) #else # define __used __attribute__((__unused__)) #endif I've Cc:-ed Linus and Andrew, to solicite feedback on __always_unused. I think we should add it. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|
Pages: 1 Prev: perf events: Remove CONFIG_EVENT_PROFILE Next: OOM killer, page fault |