From: Dudley Hanks on 11 Apr 2010 21:57 Here's a down-sized copy of the pic I'd like to submit for GDB's 2011 calendar. http://www.blind-apertures.ca/images/TrafficCheck.jpg Just wondering if Mich is in focus, or if there are any other glaring problems ... Have fun; pick it to pieces! Take Care, Dudley
From: Irwell on 11 Apr 2010 22:32 On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 01:57:15 GMT, Dudley Hanks wrote: > Here's a down-sized copy of the pic I'd like to submit for GDB's 2011 > calendar. > > http://www.blind-apertures.ca/images/TrafficCheck.jpg > > Just wondering if Mich is in focus, or if there are any other glaring > problems ... > > Have fun; pick it to pieces! > > Take Care, > Dudley Nice sharp picture, I would think that you would be wise to blur the telephone number on the dog's ID.
From: Dudley Hanks on 11 Apr 2010 22:32 "Irwell" <hook(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:wwiazk4xw0vj$.1bwfsrkhw96gw.dlg(a)40tude.net... > On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 01:57:15 GMT, Dudley Hanks wrote: > >> Here's a down-sized copy of the pic I'd like to submit for GDB's 2011 >> calendar. >> >> http://www.blind-apertures.ca/images/TrafficCheck.jpg >> >> Just wondering if Mich is in focus, or if there are any other glaring >> problems ... >> >> Have fun; pick it to pieces! >> >> Take Care, >> Dudley > > Nice sharp picture, I would think that you would be wise > to blur the telephone number on the dog's ID. Thanks for the feedback. Gotta remember to check for numbers on those darn tags ... Oh, well, it's been done so many times, the numbers pretty much in the public domain, now. Besides, what's a few more death threats ... :) Take Care, Dudley
From: NameHere on 12 Apr 2010 01:23 On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 01:57:15 GMT, "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote: >Here's a down-sized copy of the pic I'd like to submit for GDB's 2011 >calendar. > >http://www.blind-apertures.ca/images/TrafficCheck.jpg > >Just wondering if Mich is in focus, or if there are any other glaring >problems ... > >Have fun; pick it to pieces! > >Take Care, >Dudley > Sorry, I don't get paid enough to be someone's seeing-eye dog.
From: Chrlz on 12 Apr 2010 04:52
On Apr 12, 11:57 am, "Dudley Hanks" <dha...(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote: > Here's a down-sized copy of the pic I'd like to submit for GDB's 2011 > calendar. > > http://www.blind-apertures.ca/images/TrafficCheck.jpg > > Just wondering if Mich is in focus, or if there are any other glaring > problems ... > > Have fun; pick it to pieces! > > Take Care, > Dudley That's actually a pretty cool image - unconventional, but it works, somehow. The bits that should be sharp are, and you've got the depth of field about right for the shot that you (might have?!) visualised.. ;o) Technically, the sky is pretty badly washed out.. Ok, it's not the subject of the shot, but it's a bit distracting. I'm not an expert on the Canon's ability to fill-flash in this way, but I'm guessing the problem was using ISO 800... For daylight fill-flash shots with a focal plane shutter, I think that's asking for trouble... :) |