Prev: [tip:x86/mm] x86, ioremap: Fix normal ram range check
Next: [S+Q2 03/19] percpu: allow limited allocation before slab is online
From: Conny Seidel on 9 Jul 2010 15:50 Hi, On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 15:08:52 -0400 Yinghai Lu <yinghai(a)kernel.org> wrote: >On 07/09/2010 07:54 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: >> Hi, >> >> this is something we're getting during testing on one of our boxes >> here, a dual socket Magny-Cours machine. It is oopsing on the addr >> variable in __alloc_memory_core_early() after converting it to a >> virtual address in order to clear the mem region at it. I've removed >> the "#if 0.. #endif" around the printk which dumps the ranges in the >> early node map for more info. >> >> It's latest -git, 32bit build, config is attached. >> > >can not duplicate on all my setup. > >but look at the code there is limit problem with 32 bit... > >please check if it will fix the problem. > >and we will need to rebase early_res to memblock patchset. > >Thanks > >Yinghai Lu > I'm sorry but the patch isn't working. Now we are seeing this: [ 0.000000] BUG: Int 6: CR2 (null) [ 0.000000] EDI 00000005 ESI f3e00800 EBP c21afed4 ESP c21afe90 [ 0.000000] EBX 01000000 EDX 00000006 ECX (null) EAX fffffff4 [ 0.000000] err (null) EIP c2359558 CS 00000060 flg 00010046 [ 0.000000] Stack: fffffff4 (null) 00000001 f3e00000 00000005 00080000 00000001 00000002 [ 0.000000] 000b6800 00000002 f3e00000 00000001 00000002 c21aff0c c2359dd2 (null) [ 0.000000] ffe00000 00000004 (null) 00000004 001fafd8 c2943000 (null) 00004e00 [ 0.000000] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.35-rc4+ #1 [ 0.000000] Call Trace: [ 0.000000] [<c1dd39d9>] hlt_loop+0x0/0x3 [ 0.000000] [<c2359558>] ? free_area_init_node+0x5b1/0x647 [ 0.000000] [<c2359dd2>] free_area_init_nodes+0x7b5/0x89a [ 0.000000] [<c234a2c9>] paging_init+0x1a9/0x1cc [ 0.000000] [<c2330325>] setup_arch+0x1414/0x15f7 [ 0.000000] [<c23510c1>] ? __reserve_early+0x119/0x135 [ 0.000000] [<c1078c8a>] ? printk+0x36/0x54 [ 0.000000] [<c232917b>] start_kernel+0x1d0/0xb6f [ 0.000000] [<c2328163>] i386_start_kernel+0x163/0x179 ## ################################################################## # Email : conny.seidel(a)amd.com GnuPG-Key : 0xA6AB055D # # Fingerprint: 17C4 5DB2 7C4C C1C7 1452 8148 F139 7C09 A6AB 055D # ################################################################## # Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24 85609 Dornach # # General Managers: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd # # Registration: Dornach, Landkr. Muenchen; Registerger. Muenchen # # HRB Nr. 43632 # ##################################################################
From: Conny Seidel on 9 Jul 2010 16:40 On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 16:18:39 -0400 Yinghai Lu <yinghai(a)kernel.org> wrote: >On 07/09/2010 12:52 PM, Conny Seidel wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 15:08:52 -0400 >> Yinghai Lu <yinghai(a)kernel.org> wrote: >> >>> On 07/09/2010 07:54 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> this is something we're getting during testing on one of our boxes >>>> here, a dual socket Magny-Cours machine. It is oopsing on the addr >>>> variable in __alloc_memory_core_early() after converting it to a >>>> virtual address in order to clear the mem region at it. I've >>>> removed the "#if 0.. #endif" around the printk which dumps the >>>> ranges in the early node map for more info. >>>> >>>> It's latest -git, 32bit build, config is attached. >>>> >>> >>> can not duplicate on all my setup. >>> >>> but look at the code there is limit problem with 32 bit... >>> >>> please check if it will fix the problem. >>> >>> and we will need to rebase early_res to memblock patchset. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Yinghai Lu >>> >> >> I'm sorry but the patch isn't working. <snip> >can you send out boot log from start? > >YH > Sure. see the complete log in the attached file. Conny ## ################################################################## # Email : conny.seidel(a)amd.com GnuPG-Key : 0xA6AB055D # # Fingerprint: 17C4 5DB2 7C4C C1C7 1452 8148 F139 7C09 A6AB 055D # ################################################################## # Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24 85609 Dornach # # General Managers: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd # # Registration: Dornach, Landkr. Muenchen; Registerger. Muenchen # # HRB Nr. 43632 # ##################################################################
From: Conny Seidel on 9 Jul 2010 19:50 On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 18:07:50 -0400 Yinghai Lu <yinghai(a)kernel.org> wrote: >On 07/09/2010 01:42 PM, Conny Seidel wrote: >> sparse_early_mem_map_alloc: sparsemem memory map backing failed some >> memory will not be available. > >please check > This still panics, see logfile for complete trace. Conny ## ################################################################## # Email : conny.seidel(a)amd.com GnuPG-Key : 0xA6AB055D # # Fingerprint: 17C4 5DB2 7C4C C1C7 1452 8148 F139 7C09 A6AB 055D # ################################################################## # Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24 85609 Dornach # # General Managers: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd # # Registration: Dornach, Landkr. Muenchen; Registerger. Muenchen # # HRB Nr. 43632 # ##################################################################
From: Conny Seidel on 10 Jul 2010 04:20
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 21:03:42 -0400 Yinghai Lu <yinghai(a)kernel.org> wrote: >On 07/09/2010 04:51 PM, Conny Seidel wrote: >> On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 18:07:50 -0400 >> Yinghai Lu <yinghai(a)kernel.org> wrote: >> >>> On 07/09/2010 01:42 PM, Conny Seidel wrote: >>>> sparse_early_mem_map_alloc: sparsemem memory map backing failed some >>>> memory will not be available. >>> >>> please check >>> >> This still panics, see logfile for complete trace. >> > >this one should fix the problem. > >Thanks > >Yinghai Yes, Patch -v3 fixes the issue, thanks. >[PATCH -v3] x86,nobootmem: make alloc_bootmem_node fall back to other node when 32bit numa are used > >Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov(a)amd.com> reported his 32bit numa has problem: > >[ 0.000000] Reserving total of 4c00 pages for numa KVA remap >[ 0.000000] kva_start_pfn ~ 32800 max_low_pfn ~ 375fe >[ 0.000000] max_pfn = 238000 >[ 0.000000] 8202MB HIGHMEM available. >[ 0.000000] 885MB LOWMEM available. >[ 0.000000] mapped low ram: 0 - 375fe000 >[ 0.000000] low ram: 0 - 375fe000 >[ 0.000000] alloc (nid=8 100000 - 7ee00000) (1000000 - ffffffff) 1000 1000 => 34e7000 >[ 0.000000] alloc (nid=8 100000 - 7ee00000) (1000000 - ffffffff) 200 40 => 34c9d80 >[ 0.000000] alloc (nid=0 100000 - 7ee00000) (1000000 - ffffffffffffffff) 180 40 => 34e6140 >[ 0.000000] alloc (nid=1 80000000 - c7e60000) (1000000 - ffffffffffffffff) 240 40 => 80000000 >[ 0.000000] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 40000000 >[ 0.000000] IP: [<c2c8cff1>] __alloc_memory_core_early+0x147/0x1d6 >[ 0.000000] *pdpt = 0000000000000000 *pde = f000ff53f000ff00 >... >[ 0.000000] Call Trace: >[ 0.000000] [<c2c8b4f8>] ? __alloc_bootmem_node+0x216/0x22f >[ 0.000000] [<c2c90c9b>] ? sparse_early_usemaps_alloc_node+0x5a/0x10b >[ 0.000000] [<c2c9149e>] ? sparse_init+0x1dc/0x499 >[ 0.000000] [<c2c79118>] ? paging_init+0x168/0x1df >[ 0.000000] [<c2c780ff>] ? native_pagetable_setup_start+0xef/0x1bb > >looks like it allocate much high address for bootmem. > >try to cut limit with get_max_mapped() > >-v3: make alloc_bootmem_node could fallback to other node. > just like old alloc_bootmem_node did > >need this patch for 2.6.34 and 2.6.35 > >Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov(a)amd.com> >Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai(a)kernel.org> >Cc: stable(a)kernel.org Tested-by: Conny Seidel <conny.seidel(a)amd.com> ## ################################################################## # Email : conny.seidel(a)amd.com GnuPG-Key : 0xA6AB055D # # Fingerprint: 17C4 5DB2 7C4C C1C7 1452 8148 F139 7C09 A6AB 055D # ################################################################## # Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24 85609 Dornach # # General Managers: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd # # Registration: Dornach, Landkr. Muenchen; Registerger. Muenchen # # HRB Nr. 43632 # ################################################################## |