From: Jan Panteltje on 19 Apr 2010 05:23 On a sunny day (Sun, 18 Apr 2010 19:19:14 -0500) it happened "Tim Williams" <tmoranwms(a)charter.net> wrote in <hqg7i6$g73$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>: >"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonStpealmtje(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >news:hqff0r$8sn$1(a)news.albasani.net... >> Did you take into account that the speed of the electrons in that tube is >> <<< c? >> The turns per distance of the helix is chosen so the axial speed of >> the RF signal is just below the speed of the electrons. >> http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lopende-golfbuis > >Check my post from the 13th. If the total delay were due to the electron >beam, it would be powered by about 160V. Circular motion? Been many years since I had to do with a TWT amplifier. That was for a satellite uplink.
From: Jan Panteltje on 19 Apr 2010 08:57 On a sunny day (Sun, 18 Apr 2010 19:19:14 -0500) it happened "Tim Williams" <tmoranwms(a)charter.net> wrote in <hqg7i6$g73$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>: >"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonStpealmtje(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >news:hqff0r$8sn$1(a)news.albasani.net... >> Did you take into account that the speed of the electrons in that tube is >> <<< c? >> The turns per distance of the helix is chosen so the axial speed of >> the RF signal is just below the speed of the electrons. >> http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lopende-golfbuis > >Check my post from the 13th. If the total delay were due to the electron >beam, it would be powered by about 160V. Circular motion? Been many years since I had to do with a TWT amplifier. That was for a satellite uplink. PS because when you uplink to a sat at 40,000 km height, then 40 ns delay is nothing compared to what you get. Big echo when receiving back your own signal :-) And with digital processing the latency is even bigger.
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: SD card data storage questions Next: Simulating a variable resistance input with LTSpice? |