unknow user 450 to 550 reject code
in [Postfix]
|
From: Gabor Illo on 5 Jun 2010 17:43 2010.06.05. 23:31 keltez�ssel, John Peach �rta: > On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 23:26:46 +0200 > Jeroen Geilman<jeroen(a)adaptr.nl> wrote: > > >>> Ciao >>> >>> Somebody have any idea how can i change "User unknown in virtual >>> mailbox table" reject code from 450 to 550 (don't send again) >>> >>> >> The "unknown_virtual_mailbox_reject_code" response defaults to 550. >> If it is not 550 on your system, somebody altered it from the default. >> (I don't see how an undeliverable address could be anything but a >> permanent error) >> > soft_bounce is set to yes by default (so that you can correct your > config before putting it into production). > > > > > Good point! Jun 5 21:41:35 mail postfix/smtpd[90964]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from loft6024.serverloft.eu[188.138.56.28]: 550 5.1.1 <legradidavid(a)meid.hu>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual mailbox table; from=<root(a)loft6024.serverloft.eu> to=<legradidavid(a)meid.hu> proto=ESMTP helo=<loft6024.serverloft.eu> Jun 5 21:41:35 mail postfix/smtpd[90975]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from loft6024.serverloft.eu[188.138.56.28]: 550 5.1.1 <legradidavid(a)meid.hu>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual mailbox table; from=<root(a)loft6024.serverloft.eu> to=<legradidavid(a)meid.hu> proto=ESMTP helo=<loft6024.serverloft.eu> Thank you sir!
From: Jeroen Geilman on 5 Jun 2010 17:44 > > On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 23:33:04 +0200 > Jeroen Geilman<jeroen(a)adaptr.nl> wrote: > > >>> On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 23:26:46 +0200 >>> Jeroen Geilman<jeroen(a)adaptr.nl> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>> Ciao >>>>> >>>>> Somebody have any idea how can i change "User unknown in virtual >>>>> mailbox table" reject code from 450 to 550 (don't send again) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> The "unknown_virtual_mailbox_reject_code" response defaults to 550. >>>> If it is not 550 on your system, somebody altered it from the default. >>>> (I don't see how an undeliverable address could be anything but a >>>> permanent error) >>>> >>>> >>> soft_bounce is set to yes by default (so that you can correct your >>> config before putting it into production). >>> >>> >>> >>> >> A REJECT isn't a bounce, is it ? Unless this is documented as such, I >> don't see the connection. >> > As with all of postfix, it is clearly documented: > > http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_ACCESS_README.html > > > I should have known!
From: /dev/rob0 on 6 Jun 2010 00:27 On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 05:31:17PM -0400, John Peach wrote: > soft_bounce is set to yes by default (so that you can correct > your config before putting it into production). Not so. Granted that this may have been the OP's problem, but the Postfix default is "no": $ /usr/sbin/postconf -d soft_bounce soft_bounce = no Does some distributor change this default? -- Offlist mail to this address is discarded unless "/dev/rob0" or "not-spam" is in Subject: header
From: Michael Tokarev on 6 Jun 2010 13:01
06.06.2010 01:31, John Peach wrote: > On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 23:26:46 +0200 > Jeroen Geilman<jeroen(a)adaptr.nl> wrote: > >> The "unknown_virtual_mailbox_reject_code" response defaults to 550. >> If it is not 550 on your system, somebody altered it from the default. >> (I don't see how an undeliverable address could be anything but a >> permanent error) > > soft_bounce is set to yes by default (so that you can correct your > config before putting it into production). soft_bounce is set to NO by default. Proof: execute postconf -d soft_bounce on your system, -- -d shows the default values. Any distribution that ships with soft_bounce=yes is broken. Because people often does not pay enough attention and leaves the default at it, which results in a broken postfix install. Note that postfix at least tries to work out of the box. /mjt |