From: Jerry on
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:23:00 -0700, David O'Brien <obrien(a)freebsd.org>
articulated:

> Hi Folks,
>
> Bash 4.1 seems stable enough at PL5 to replace version 4.0 in
> '/usr/ports/shells/bash'.
>
> Does anyone feel that we need a "shells/bash40" port?
> (please just let me know if you feel we do, not if you feel we don't)
>
> The patch below is the upgrade to 4.1. It works on the workstation
> undermydesk, but maybe not the one underyourdesk. Please let me know
> in the next few days if you will have trouble with the updated Bash
> port.

I don't see any reason to keep it around. In reality, it just clutters
up the ports system with more deprecated software. In any case, "4.1"
corrects a few problems in the older version. I believe it is at patch
level 5 now, as your patch indicates.

Just my 2ยข.

--
Jerry
FreeBSD-Ports.user(a)seibercom.net

Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__________________________________________________________________

Man is a military animal,
Glories in gunpowder, and loves parade.


P. J. Bailey
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"

From: Doug Barton on
On 04/12/10 15:23, David O'Brien wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Bash 4.1 seems stable enough at PL5 to replace version 4.0 in
> '/usr/ports/shells/bash'.

Agreed, I tested the PL5 with your patch and it seems fine.

Please consider the attached patch as well, that adds OPTIONS generally
for the knobs already in the port, and a new option to use bash's
readline instead of the base version.


hth,

Doug

--

... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
-- Propellerheads

Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/

From: Doug Barton on
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010, Doug Barton wrote:

> On 04/12/10 15:23, David O'Brien wrote:
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> Bash 4.1 seems stable enough at PL5 to replace version 4.0 in
>> '/usr/ports/shells/bash'.
>
> Agreed, I tested the PL5 with your patch and it seems fine.
>
> Please consider the attached patch as well, that adds OPTIONS generally
> for the knobs already in the port, and a new option to use bash's
> readline instead of the base version.

Sorry, there was a logic error in the readline bit. Turns out if you
actually try to use that configure option then compilation fails.

Also, in spite of the --enable-static-link option the resultant binary is
dynamically linked. I checked both a port build and building it by hand,
same result. The current shells/bash (4.0) does not have this problem.


Doug

--

Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/

Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
-- Pablo Picasso

_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"