From: pirovano on 12 Jul 2010 12:18 Hello, in order for @domain.com beeing passed through virtusertable, it must be added to local-host-names. another option may be putting the domain into relay-domains, and make use of mailertable and access. but i believe in your case local-host-names and virtusertable is the easyer way. Regards, lorenzo
From: Frank Luo on 12 Jul 2010 12:30 the domain name is already in local-host-names BTW, the sendmail version is 8.14.3. ANy idea it does not work? Thanks On Jul 12, 12:18 pm, pirovano <pirov...(a)pirovano.ch> wrote: > Hello, > > in order for @domain.com beeing passed through virtusertable, it must > be added to local-host-names. > > another option may be putting the domain into relay-domains, and make > use of mailertable and access. > > but i believe in your case local-host-names and virtusertable is the > easyer way. > > Regards, > > lorenzo
From: pirovano on 12 Jul 2010 12:31 On 12 Jul., 18:18, pirovano <pirov...(a)pirovano.ch> wrote: > Hello, > > in order for @domain.com beeing passed through virtusertable, it must > be added to local-host-names. > > another option may be putting the domain into relay-domains, and make > use of mailertable and access. > > but i believe in your case local-host-names and virtusertable is the > easyer way. > > Regards, > > lorenzo if user1(a)domain.com must not be changed, then put domain.com smtp:[server1.domain.com] into mailertable, and domain.com into relay-domains. like this, anything(a)domain.com will be passed unchanged to server1.domain.com. to allow certain e-mail aliases only, put To:user1(a)domain.com RELAY To:user2(a)domain.com RELAY To:domain.com REJECT into access.
From: Frank Luo on 12 Jul 2010 12:36 On Jul 12, 12:31 pm, pirovano <pirov...(a)pirovano.ch> wrote: > On 12 Jul., 18:18, pirovano <pirov...(a)pirovano.ch> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > in order for @domain.com beeing passed through virtusertable, it must > > be added to local-host-names. > > > another option may be putting the domain into relay-domains, and make > > use of mailertable and access. > > > but i believe in your case local-host-names and virtusertable is the > > easyer way. > > > Regards, > > > lorenzo > > if us...(a)domain.com must not be changed, then put > > domain.com smtp:[server1.domain.com] > > into mailertable, and > > domain.com > > into relay-domains. > > like this, anyth...(a)domain.com will be passed unchanged to > server1.domain.com. > > to allow certain e-mail aliases only, put > > To:us...(a)domain.com RELAY > To:us...(a)domain.com RELAY > To:domain.com REJECT > > into access. that worked before we have to have to server2 to take care portion of users. So some users go to server1 and some go to server2. Also both the mailertable and relay are set up like what you said here already. It seems that virtuserable overrules them.
From: pirovano on 12 Jul 2010 12:44 ah, i see! how to do it with sendmail, i don't know. after all, splitting a @domain.com into 2 servers is a bad idea in my opinion. but, to make this work, the administrators must accept user1(a)server1.domain.com and user2(a)server2.domain.com, then you can work with local-host-names and virtusertable as you described before. Regards, lorenzo
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 Prev: [Info: RTCyrus3] Sendmail and Cyrus-IMAP integration Next: whitelisting email addresses |