Prev: Sorting in linear time ...
Next: Naked Netbook
From: Bill Cunningham on 28 Apr 2010 14:46 Are there any groups o USENET that are for networking and network designers? I need to get together with someone and IRC or usenet pretty bad. I have some things to work out concerning networking. And not windows networking please. Bill
From: Lie Ryan on 28 Apr 2010 16:03 On 04/29/10 04:46, Bill Cunningham wrote: > Are there any groups o USENET that are for networking and network > designers? I need to get together with someone and IRC or usenet pretty bad. > I have some things to work out concerning networking. And not windows > networking please. GGSIYF (Google Groups Search Is Your Friend)
From: Bill Cunningham on 28 Apr 2010 16:36 Lie Ryan wrote: > GGSIYF (Google Groups Search Is Your Friend) I've tried google so I will look at google groups. Bill
From: Rui Maciel on 28 Apr 2010 19:37 Lie Ryan wrote: > GGSIYF (Google Groups Search Is Your Friend) Actually, it isn't. Google groups returns terrible results, even when performing straight forward searches such as explicitly searching for the exact name of a specific newsgroup. I don't know what google did to deja but I want it back. Rui Maciel
From: Lie Ryan on 30 Apr 2010 16:28
On 04/29/10 09:37, Rui Maciel wrote: > Lie Ryan wrote: > >> GGSIYF (Google Groups Search Is Your Friend) > > Actually, it isn't. Google groups returns terrible results, even when performing straight forward > searches such as explicitly searching for the exact name of a specific newsgroup. > Really? When I search for "comp.programming", this is in the first line of the result: """ Groups matching comp.programming comp.programming Programming issues that transcend languages and OSs. 3809 members - 0 days ago comp.programming.threads All issues about multithreaded programming. 2631 members - 0 days ago 11 more � <regular search result follows> """ and if you want to be more specific, you can search for: 'search query group:comp.programming' (or use Advanced Search). I found the group search decently good enough; it's a pity that you don't. |