From: Loki Harfagr on 23 Dec 2009 05:24 Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:24:04 +0100, goarilla(a)work did cat : > Loki Harfagr wrote: >> Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:40:33 +0000, goarilla did cat : >> >>> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:33:02 +0000, Loki Harfagr wrote: >>> >>>> Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:09:20 -0500, Michael Black did cat : >>>> >>>>> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009, Loki Harfagr wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:41:00 +0100, Helmut Hullen did cat : >>>>>> >>>>>>> to overwrite the restrictions of shadow-4.0.3-i486-18.txz You may >>>>>>> use it especially in the neighbourhood of "samba". "Ubuntu" - an >>>>>>> African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me". >>>>>> incidentally these two sentences make two very good points for >>>>>> *not* "overwriting the 'enforcements' in shadow-4.0.3" ;-) >>>>>> >>>>> Didn't this very topic come up within the past few months? Maybe it >>>>> was in one of the other Linux newsgroups, but it was all hashed out >>>>> then. >>>> Oh yes, it was this very group and, in terse almost (yes almost) >>>> trollish condensed article, the punch end line was definitely that >>>> some folks should use Ubuntu and others may prefer a sane system ;-) >>> there are other reasons to "upgrade" shadow sha[0-9]+ password hashes >>> instead of md5 or crypt. >> >> That one would be a much better reason to upgrade the shadow, maybe >> Robby would now tell wherabouts they are in the discussion around that >> integration, (PAM issues or what?) >> >> Anyway back to the OQ, I certainly wouldn't addup mixed case logins >> just because a recent shadow would allow it ;-) > > it's not on purpose it's just that windows is case insensitive but case > preservative, which can cause trouble when samba is used as a PDC. Correct but that brings the question why would I break a sane system to make a workaround for another system bug?-) Have you filed a bug to Microsoft bug report board? Or mailed your users to also file the bug and meanwhile either repair their namespace scheme and/or change for a sane system?-)
From: goarilla on 23 Dec 2009 07:56 Loki Harfagr wrote: > Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:24:04 +0100, goarilla(a)work did cat : > >> Loki Harfagr wrote: >>> Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:40:33 +0000, goarilla did cat : >>> >>>> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:33:02 +0000, Loki Harfagr wrote: >>>> >>>>> Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:09:20 -0500, Michael Black did cat : >>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009, Loki Harfagr wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:41:00 +0100, Helmut Hullen did cat : >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> to overwrite the restrictions of shadow-4.0.3-i486-18.txz You may >>>>>>>> use it especially in the neighbourhood of "samba". "Ubuntu" - an >>>>>>>> African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me". >>>>>>> incidentally these two sentences make two very good points for >>>>>>> *not* "overwriting the 'enforcements' in shadow-4.0.3" ;-) >>>>>>> >>>>>> Didn't this very topic come up within the past few months? Maybe it >>>>>> was in one of the other Linux newsgroups, but it was all hashed out >>>>>> then. >>>>> Oh yes, it was this very group and, in terse almost (yes almost) >>>>> trollish condensed article, the punch end line was definitely that >>>>> some folks should use Ubuntu and others may prefer a sane system ;-) >>>> there are other reasons to "upgrade" shadow sha[0-9]+ password hashes >>>> instead of md5 or crypt. >>> That one would be a much better reason to upgrade the shadow, maybe >>> Robby would now tell wherabouts they are in the discussion around that >>> integration, (PAM issues or what?) >>> >>> Anyway back to the OQ, I certainly wouldn't addup mixed case logins >>> just because a recent shadow would allow it ;-) >> it's not on purpose it's just that windows is case insensitive but case >> preservative, which can cause trouble when samba is used as a PDC. > > Correct but that brings the question why would I break a sane system to > make a workaround for another system bug?-) > Have you filed a bug to Microsoft bug report board? Or mailed > your users to also file the bug that never works with redmond and we all know it
|
Pages: 1 Prev: problems mounting external USB HD Next: Slackware 13.0 with KDE 3.5.10? |