v = c - Ht solves acceleration
in [Physics]
|
Prev: If Obama Gives Amnesty, This Is What Will Happen To Us
Next: Quantum Gravity 394.7: Holographic Principle From Probable Causation/Influence
From: Michael Helland on 8 May 2010 16:56 H = 21 km/sec / years in millions v is the speed of light t is how duration of its journey from a distant galaxy to our telescope Notice that as the years go by, the velocity of light drops steadily according to time, not distance. If you tried to match this line up with a similar one where the velocity of light is proportional to distance, not time, you'd find that the distance relationship requires an increase in H to keep up with the time relationship because the distance relationship is taking an increasing amount of time to cover the same distance. My simple formula effortlessly explains acceleration.
From: Igor on 9 May 2010 10:08 On May 8, 4:56 pm, Michael Helland <mobyd...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > H = 21 km/sec / years in millions > v is the speed of light > t is how duration of its journey from a distant galaxy to our > telescope > > Notice that as the years go by, the velocity of light drops steadily > according to time, not distance. > > If you tried to match this line up with a similar one where the > velocity of light is proportional to distance, not time, you'd find > that the distance relationship requires an increase in H to keep up > with the time relationship because the distance relationship is taking > an increasing amount of time to cover the same distance. > > My simple formula effortlessly explains acceleration. Too bad the acceleration has the wrong sign.
From: Sam Wormley on 9 May 2010 10:19 On 5/8/10 3:56 PM, Michael Helland wrote: > H = 21 km/sec / years in millions Perhaps you meant H_o = 71 km/s/Mpc
From: Michael Helland on 9 May 2010 15:57 On May 9, 7:19 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 5/8/10 3:56 PM, Michael Helland wrote: > > > H = 21 km/sec / years in millions > > Perhaps you meant H_o = 71 km/s/Mpc Having the units in km/sec / DISTANCE is the issue, because the light slows down and covers less distance as the Universe continues its so- called expansion at a constant rate according to TIME. It should be km/ sec/ TIME. Since 21 is the value when its in terms of Million Light Years instead of Megaparsec, then we can use the same value in units of km/sec/ million years
From: Sam Wormley on 9 May 2010 21:46
On 5/9/10 2:57 PM, Michael Helland wrote: > On May 9, 7:19 am, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On 5/8/10 3:56 PM, Michael Helland wrote: >> >>> H = 21 km/sec / years in millions >> >> Perhaps you meant H_o = 71 km/s/Mpc > > > Having the units in km/sec / DISTANCE is the issue, because the light > slows down and covers less distance as the Universe continues its so- > called expansion at a constant rate according to TIME. It should be km/ > sec/ TIME. > > Since 21 is the value when its in terms of Million Light Years instead > of Megaparsec, then we can use the same value in units of km/sec/ > million years Many call you idiot because you confuse distance and time units--light years and years. 71 km/s/Mpc = 22 km/s/Mly |