vfs: Add no_nrwrite_index_update writeback control flag
in [Kernel]
|
Prev: writeback: pay attention to wbc->nr_to_write in write_cache_pages
Next: acquire_console_mutex: WARNING: at 2.6.33.4-rt20/kernel/mutex-debug.c:65 mutex_remove_waiter+0xe8/0x11c()
From: Jayson R. King on 25 May 2010 13:40 On 05/25/2010 11:52 AM, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 07:12:08AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 03:28:06PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: >>> 2.6.27-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. >> >> NACK. This has been shown to cause severe writeback regression for >> other filesystems and is beeing reverted in mianline. > > Ok, if I drop this one, I think I need to drop an ext4 patch as well, > I'll go figure that out and respin a -rc2 with this change in it. You'd have to drop the next two ext4 -stable patches to get a buildable kernel if you drop this one. The last of those ext4 patches is the one which fixes the deadlock from kernel bugzilla #12579. Jayson -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Jayson R. King on 25 May 2010 21:30
On 05/25/2010 12:12 PM, Greg KH wrote: > I've now dropped those next two ext4 patches. If someone wants to get > this bug fixed for the .27 tree, please feel free to send me the > patches. I'll nominate Ted's "ext4: Use our own write_cache_pages()" patch for ..27-stable when it hits mainline. If it is included in -stable, then those last two ext4 patches can be re-applied. > Personally, I doubt many people care about ext4 on the .27 kernel > release... In any case, 2.6.27 is a good kernel, and ext4 is a good FS, IMO. Jayson -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |
