From: Valdis.Kletnieks on 2 Aug 2010 09:10 On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:20:01 +0200, Miklos Szeredi said: > Index: linux-2.6/fs/dcache.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/dcache.c 2010-07-06 18:08:16.000000000 +0200 > +++ linux-2.6/fs/dcache.c 2010-07-06 18:08:19.000000000 +0200 > @@ -1977,8 +1977,7 @@ global_root: > * @buffer: buffer to return value in > * @buflen: buffer length > * > - * Convert a dentry into an ASCII path name. If the entry has been deleted > - * the string " (deleted)" is appended. Note that this is ambiguous. > + * Convert a dentry into an ASCII path name. > * > * Returns a pointer into the buffer or an error code if the > * path was too long. I'd prefer the comment about it being ambiguous remain. I'm waiting to see how long it takes for somebody to create a security hole by creating a file called '/etc/some/thing/important (deleted)' and having some software Do The Wrong Thing instead to /etc/some/thing/important.
From: Bastien ROUCARIES on 2 Aug 2010 09:30 On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 3:00 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks(a)vt.edu> wrote: > On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:20:01 +0200, Miklos Szeredi said: > >> Index: linux-2.6/fs/dcache.c >> =================================================================== >> --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/dcache.c � � � �2010-07-06 18:08:16.000000000 +0200 >> +++ linux-2.6/fs/dcache.c � � 2010-07-06 18:08:19.000000000 +0200 >> @@ -1977,8 +1977,7 @@ global_root: >> � * @buffer: buffer to return value in >> � * @buflen: buffer length >> � * >> - * Convert a dentry into an ASCII path name. If the entry has been deleted >> - * the string " (deleted)" is appended. Note that this is ambiguous. >> + * Convert a dentry into an ASCII path name. >> � * >> � * Returns a pointer into the buffer or an error code if the >> � * path was too long. > > I'd prefer the comment about it being ambiguous remain. �I'm waiting to see how > long it takes for somebody to create a security hole by creating a file called > '/etc/some/thing/important (deleted)' and having some software Do The Wrong > Thing instead to /etc/some/thing/important. > In order to close this kind of hole why not creating a deleted directory on /proc and redirect symbolic link to this directory. And do the same for unreachable. If we use the good permission it will work from a backaward compatibily point of view bastien -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Miklos Szeredi on 2 Aug 2010 09:40 On Mon, 02 Aug 2010, Valdis.Kletnieks(a)vt.ed wrote: > On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:20:01 +0200, Miklos Szeredi said: > > > Index: linux-2.6/fs/dcache.c > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/dcache.c 2010-07-06 18:08:16.000000000 +0200 > > +++ linux-2.6/fs/dcache.c 2010-07-06 18:08:19.000000000 +0200 > > @@ -1977,8 +1977,7 @@ global_root: > > * @buffer: buffer to return value in > > * @buflen: buffer length > > * > > - * Convert a dentry into an ASCII path name. If the entry has been deleted > > - * the string " (deleted)" is appended. Note that this is ambiguous. > > + * Convert a dentry into an ASCII path name. > > * > > * Returns a pointer into the buffer or an error code if the > > * path was too long. > > I'd prefer the comment about it being ambiguous remain. I'm waiting > to see how long it takes for somebody to create a security hole by > creating a file called '/etc/some/thing/important (deleted)' and > having some software Do The Wrong Thing instead to > /etc/some/thing/important. The same comment is left intact on top of d_path(). It is removed from __d_path() because this function no longer appends "(deleted)". Thanks, Miklos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Valdis.Kletnieks on 2 Aug 2010 11:20 On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:35:20 +0200, Miklos Szeredi said: > > I'd prefer the comment about it being ambiguous remain. I'm waiting > > to see how long it takes for somebody to create a security hole by > > creating a file called '/etc/some/thing/important (deleted)' and > > having some software Do The Wrong Thing instead to > > /etc/some/thing/important. > > The same comment is left intact on top of d_path(). > > It is removed from __d_path() because this function no longer appends > "(deleted)". Oh, OK. Obviously -ENOCAFFEINE on my part, I thought you were nuking the d_path() copy. ;)
|
Pages: 1 Prev: [PATCH 1/9 v3] staging: dt3155: check put_user() return value Next: Over-eager swapping |