Prev: Email service providers
Next: postscreen: refresh of stored entries?
From: Philippe Cerfon on 30 Dec 2009 17:49
Hi.

When havin a domain that hast just aliases on no real maliboxes, on
could either use virtual_alias_domains or virtual_mailbox_domains and
in the later case simply not creating any mailboxes but just
configuring addresses in virtual_alias_maps.

Is there any performance benfit or something like this when using
virtual_alias_domains?


Thanks,
Philippe.

From: Victor Duchovni on 30 Dec 2009 18:02
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 11:49:24PM +0100, Philippe Cerfon wrote:

> When havin a domain that hast just aliases on no real maliboxes, on
> could either use virtual_alias_domains or virtual_mailbox_domains and
> in the later case simply not creating any mailboxes but just
> configuring addresses in virtual_alias_maps.
>
> Is there any performance benfit or something like this when using
> virtual_alias_domains?

Use the right tool for the job. No possible performance improvement
is worth the configuration confusion. No, there is no performance
advantage, more likely a negligible loss, but this is not the main
reason to choose the right answer.

--
Viktor.

Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.

To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majordomo(a)postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>

If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Email service providers
Next: postscreen: refresh of stored entries?