Prev: Embarrassing regex question
Next: Call for Papers: International Conference on Intelligent Automation and Robotics ICIAR 2010
From: Qu0ll on 23 Jun 2010 06:20 "Knute Johnson" <nospam(a)rabbitbrush.frazmtn.com> wrote in message news:Ua4Un.10664$1Q5.6348(a)newsfe08.iad... > On 6/22/2010 12:56 AM, Qu0ll wrote: >> "Knute Johnson" <nospam(a)rabbitbrush.frazmtn.com> wrote in message >> news:gKLTn.11903$hw5.8306(a)newsfe04.iad... >>> On 6/20/2010 11:51 PM, Lixing wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I have been googling this topic for a while, and cannot find anything >>>> I want.. >>>> >>>> basically, there are two suggestions on the web, first is JMF, but >>>> Java has stopped supporting that for a long time, and it is not native >>>> to Mac; the second is QuickTime for Java, unfortunately, it is >>>> deprecated... >>>> >>>> Could you please give me some suggestions? >>>> >>>> Thanks a lot, >>>> Lixing >>> >>> You are really stuck with JMF or you can wait for Java7 but that is >>> going to take a long time for MAC. >> >> What makes you think Java 7 is going to offer video support for anything >> other than JavaFX? > > That's been their claim for years. Maybe they won't now with FX. Yes, but the latest word is that if you want video in a Java application/applet you have to use FX. Oracle is pushing FX very hard to the detriment of any further Swing/Java2D development which is a slap in the face for many people, me included. -- And loving it, -Qu0ll (Rare, not extinct) _________________________________________________ Qu0llSixFour(a)gmail.com [Replace the "SixFour" with numbers to email me]
From: Knute Johnson on 23 Jun 2010 11:59 On 6/23/2010 3:20 AM, Qu0ll wrote: > "Knute Johnson" <nospam(a)rabbitbrush.frazmtn.com> wrote in message > news:Ua4Un.10664$1Q5.6348(a)newsfe08.iad... >> On 6/22/2010 12:56 AM, Qu0ll wrote: >>> "Knute Johnson" <nospam(a)rabbitbrush.frazmtn.com> wrote in message >>> news:gKLTn.11903$hw5.8306(a)newsfe04.iad... >>>> On 6/20/2010 11:51 PM, Lixing wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I have been googling this topic for a while, and cannot find anything >>>>> I want.. >>>>> >>>>> basically, there are two suggestions on the web, first is JMF, but >>>>> Java has stopped supporting that for a long time, and it is not native >>>>> to Mac; the second is QuickTime for Java, unfortunately, it is >>>>> deprecated... >>>>> >>>>> Could you please give me some suggestions? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks a lot, >>>>> Lixing >>>> >>>> You are really stuck with JMF or you can wait for Java7 but that is >>>> going to take a long time for MAC. >>> >>> What makes you think Java 7 is going to offer video support for anything >>> other than JavaFX? >> >> That's been their claim for years. Maybe they won't now with FX. > > Yes, but the latest word is that if you want video in a Java > application/applet you have to use FX. Oracle is pushing FX very hard to > the detriment of any further Swing/Java2D development which is a slap in > the face for many people, me included. > I looked at the JDK7 website just now and I don't see any new audio/video API. I guess I'm going to have to learn how to use FX. -- Knute Johnson email s/nospam/knute2010/
From: markspace on 23 Jun 2010 13:20 Knute Johnson wrote: > > I looked at the JDK7 website just now and I don't see any new > audio/video API. I guess I'm going to have to learn how to use FX. > Actually, you can just use the JavaFX classes directly in your Java programs. They're just regular old Java classes. Sometimes the arguments or results are a little weird: to be "friendly" JavaFX script does a lot of autoboxing and type-conversion automatically, and JavaFX classes tend to use Number and Lists of Objects a lot, iirc, but that's not a serious impediment to working with them.
From: Knute Johnson on 23 Jun 2010 13:28 On 6/23/2010 10:20 AM, markspace wrote: > Knute Johnson wrote: > >> >> I looked at the JDK7 website just now and I don't see any new >> audio/video API. I guess I'm going to have to learn how to use FX. >> > > > Actually, you can just use the JavaFX classes directly in your Java > programs. They're just regular old Java classes. Sometimes the arguments > or results are a little weird: to be "friendly" JavaFX script does a lot > of autoboxing and type-conversion automatically, and JavaFX classes tend > to use Number and Lists of Objects a lot, iirc, but that's not a serious > impediment to working with them. > Thanks. I looked at it early on but it wasn't clear to me how to actually use it in a Java program. I think I need FX for dummies to get started :-). -- Knute Johnson email s/nospam/knute2010/
From: markspace on 23 Jun 2010 14:40
Knute Johnson wrote: > Thanks. I looked at it early on but it wasn't clear to me how to > actually use it in a Java program. I think I need FX for dummies to get > started :-). > This is the book I have, it does cover using JavaFX classes with Java SE: <http://www.amazon.com/JavaFX-Developing-Rich-Internet-Applications/dp/013701287X> I'll try to put together a quick example later.... |