From: honghanru on 8 Aug 2010 15:40 please check my posts.
From: fishfry on 8 Aug 2010 20:48 In article <feb99fc7-1ee0-4aa7-b20b-ed95754dd171(a)s9g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>, honghanru <honghanru(a)googlemail.com> wrote: > please check my posts. I have no time!
From: Gerry Myerson on 8 Aug 2010 23:46 In article <BLOCKSPAMfishfry-E11642.17483708082010(a)news.giganews.com>, fishfry <BLOCKSPAMfishfry(a)your-mailbox.com> wrote: > In article > <feb99fc7-1ee0-4aa7-b20b-ed95754dd171(a)s9g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>, > honghanru <honghanru(a)googlemail.com> wrote: > > > please check my posts. > > I have no time! Don't do it - she's not worth it! -- Gerry Myerson (gerry(a)maths.mq.edi.ai) (i -> u for email)
From: Chip Eastham on 9 Aug 2010 12:52 On Aug 8, 3:40 pm, honghanru <hongha...(a)googlemail.com> wrote: > please check my posts. Perhaps my reply to your post of last week on a nominally related subject did not deserve the courtesy of a response from you. In any case I did not receive one. Please check your posts. regards, chip
|
Pages: 1 Prev: surface integral- a second reply Next: Proof by negation an' come join the fun |