From: Nix on 27 Sep 2009 05:11 On 26 Sep 2009, Ian Northeast said: > There is also sux, found in many distros, which is like su but also passes > on the X credentials, useful if you need to run anything graphical as root. This is presumably obsolete now that we have pam_xauth.
From: Nico Kadel-Garcia on 27 Sep 2009 07:43 On Sep 27, 4:11 am, Nix <nix-razor-...(a)esperi.org.uk> wrote: > On 26 Sep 2009, Ian Northeast said: > > > There is also sux, found in many distros, which is like su but also passes > > on the X credentials, useful if you need to run anything graphical as root. > > This is presumably obsolete now that we have pam_xauth. sudo has also correctly handled this for years. In most instances, I prefer sudo for its subtlety of available optioins, and prefer sudo for its ability to allow designated users very specific administrative privileges, using their own passwords, rather than giving them a local root privilege. It helps me avoid having to write suid programs, as well.
From: FP on 28 Sep 2009 05:16 On 26/09/2009 07:26, Unruh wrote: > JJ <santa(a)temporaryinbox.com> writes: > > >>Hi all > > >>I needed to ask a question about the Linux commands used for getting >>root access. > > >>The question is, what is the difference between "tsu", "su", and >>"sudo"? > > > Never heard of tsu. Not on my system. Could it be a utility on Sun systems? Something to do with art, or war? FP
From: Wanna-Be Sys Admin on 28 Sep 2009 05:49 FP wrote: > Could it be a utility on Sun systems? Something to do with art, or > war? > > FP Nice. -- Not really a wanna-be, but I don't know everything.
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Recommendations for eye candy distro Next: Map keyboard key to middle mouse button |