From: junzhang1983 on
thank you in advanced....
From: GArlington on
On Jul 7, 11:08 am, junzhang1...(a)gmail.com wrote:
> thank you in advanced....

Any details?
Cipher cipher = Cipher(CipherSpi cipherSpi, Provider provider, String
transformation) ?
From: Lew on
GArlington wrote:
> On Jul 7, 11:08 am, junzhang1...(a)gmail.com wrote:
>> thank you in advanced....
>
> Any details?
> Cipher cipher = Cipher(CipherSpi cipherSpi, Provider provider, String
> transformation) ?

I think the "thank you" was a repost off a different thread. Let this thread
die and go back to the primary one.

--
Lew
From: junzhang1983 on
sorry, l should have disribe the question more clearly
my code source is:
Security.addProvider(new BouncyCastleProvider());
Cipher cipher = Cipher.getInstance("RSA/NONE/PKCS1PADDING","BC");
and it throw Exception "The provider BC may not be signed by a trusted
party",
l have searched the answer on the internet, and try many times,but
lt's a pity that no answer is correct for me, who can explain the
reason?thanks

Lew wrote:
> GArlington wrote:
> > On Jul 7, 11:08 am, junzhang1...(a)gmail.com wrote:
> >> thank you in advanced....
> >
> > Any details?
> > Cipher cipher = Cipher(CipherSpi cipherSpi, Provider provider, String
> > transformation) ?
>
> I think the "thank you" was a repost off a different thread. Let this thread
> die and go back to the primary one.
>
> --
> Lew
From: Lew on
Please do not top-post. Post in line with the parts to which you respond, and
trim your posts.

junzhang1983(a)gmail.com wrote:
> sorry, l [sic] should have disribe the question more clearly
> my code source is:
> Security.addProvider(new BouncyCastleProvider());
> Cipher cipher = Cipher.getInstance("RSA/NONE/PKCS1PADDING","BC");
> and it throw Exception "The provider BC may not be signed by a trusted
> party",
> l have searched the answer on the internet, and try many times,but
> lt's a pity that no answer is correct for me, who can explain the
> reason?thanks

But this is the same question you ask in the other thread!

You don't need two threads on the same topic. There are answers in the other
thread. Starting two threads fragments the conversation.

Lew wrote:
>> Let this thread die and go back to the primary one.

--
Lew