From: Daniel Brown on 19 Mar 2010 21:16 On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 21:04, Daniel Brown <danbrown(a)php.net> wrote: > > Indeed. It would probably be better to read, "Unavailable as of > PHP 6." I'll patch that in the XML sources now, and the next time the > manual rebuilds, the changes will take effect. Future builds will appear as hinted in the following SVN commit log: http://news.php.net/php.doc.cvs/6235 Thanks again for the suggestion, Rob. -- </Daniel P. Brown> daniel.brown(a)parasane.net || danbrown(a)php.net http://www.parasane.net/ || http://www.pilotpig.net/ Looking for hosting or dedicated servers? Ask me how we can fit your budget!
From: "Robert P. J. Day" on 20 Mar 2010 04:39 On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, Daniel Brown wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 16:59, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday(a)crashcourse.ca> wrote: > > > > i don't see a separate mailing list for documentation so is this > > where i would point at oddities in the manual? as in, here: > > > > http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.variables.external.php > > > > we read: > > > > "// Unavailable since PHP 6." > > > > that just looks weird, no? > > Indeed. It would probably be better to read, "Unavailable as of > PHP 6." I'll patch that in the XML sources now, and the next time > the manual rebuilds, the changes will take effect. precisely the point i was trying to make, but i might avoid the use of the word "unavailable" since that's still slightly ambiguous. it makes it seem like it's still there somehow, you just can't get to it. i would be more direct, something like "*removed* as of PHP 6." then there's no confusion. > For the future, please report such things as Documentation > Problems at http://bugs.php.net/. ok, will do. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry. Web page: http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday ========================================================================
From: "Robert P. J. Day" on 20 Mar 2010 06:33 On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, Daniel Brown wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 20:57, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday(a)crashcourse.ca> wrote: > > > > i'm not sure that addresses my post -- it doesn't make grammatical > > sense to state that something is unavailable "since" something that is > > yet to be officially released. > > In most cases, you'd be absolutely correct.... but PHP is a > developer-focused open source project, so some folks in the community > do use PHP 6. If you'd like to be one of them, we'd certainly welcome > the extra help in finding and reporting bugs! You can always download > the latest snapshot builds at: > > http://snaps.php.net/ surely there's a svn checkout for the ongoing php 6, yes? rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry. Web page: http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday ========================================================================
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Event/Exhibition Organizers Management Software Next: php compile / configure options |