Prev: Coding style correction in HDLC/Frame Relay support routines
Next: [tip:perf/scripting] perf trace/scripting: Ignore shadowed variable warning for perf-trace-perl.c
From: Erez Zadok on 30 Nov 2009 03:10 In message <1256152779-10054-18-git-send-email-vaurora(a)redhat.com>, Valerie Aurora writes: > From: Jan Blunck <jblunck(a)suse.de> > > Add a path_whiteout() helper for vfs_whiteout(). > > Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck(a)suse.org> > Signed-off-by: Valerie Aurora <vaurora(a)redhat.com> > --- > fs/namei.c | 15 ++++++++++++++- > include/linux/fs.h | 1 - > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c > index 9a62c75..408380d 100644 > --- a/fs/namei.c > +++ b/fs/namei.c > @@ -2231,7 +2231,7 @@ static inline int may_whiteout(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *victim, > * After this returns with success, don't make any assumptions about the inode. > * Just dput() it dentry. > */ > -int vfs_whiteout(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, int isdir) > +static int vfs_whiteout(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, int isdir) Didn't some other patch introduce vfs_whiteout? So why have a second patch which makes vfs_whiteout a static? Why not introduce both vfs_whiteout and path_whiteout in one patch? > { > int err; > struct inode *old_inode = dentry->d_inode; > @@ -2283,6 +2283,19 @@ int vfs_whiteout(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, int isdir) > return err; > } > > +int path_whiteout(struct path *dir_path, struct dentry *dentry, int isdir) Please document the behavior of path_whiteout in a proper comment above ii (kernel-doc). Describe return values, side effects, etc. Also, isdir in both vfs_whiteout and path_whiteout can be boolean. Erez. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |